mono or stereo?

monoreo

>>72441500
Mono. It was mastered in Mono, and sounds far superior to Stereo. This is coming from initially listening in Stereo.

>Anything mastered in Mono sounds better in Mono.

>>72441500
Mono by far.

>>72441521
>>72441535
This is my favorite album and I've only listened to it in stereo. Is the mono version really that much better?

>>72441535
BY FAR!!1
Y

F
A
R

File: beforeandafter.jpg (16KB, 399x191px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 399x191px

>>72441813
I only starting listening to it after I accidentally downloaded a Mono FLAC copy of Soulseek.

It really is the definitive version.

duophonic

You get a lot more clarity with the stereo, particulary on a song like Wouldn't It Be Nice. However Mono also has moments that are only available on the mono mix as Brian added them only during the mixing session such as his vocals on God Only Knows.

So 50/50 but mono and stereo both sound fantastic on the Analogue Production release.

>>72441865
Sweet. I'll look for a mono version after my lab practical. Thanks.

>>72441922
All good man. If you don't end up liking the Mono version that's fine too.

>>72441521
It depends on the version though. The 50th Anniversary Stereo mix is fantastic.

>>72442342
Is it? I'll defientley have a listen then.

>>72441509
George Martin ??

Whilst this thread is up, why would you not want the stereo remaster? I know some people hate the Beatles remaster but I've never heard any reasons aside from it being different.

What do you guys think of the 5.1 remaster of ITCOTCK?

Either way the album's still shit