Bowie / Starman

Who cares? Iggy Pop is far superior.

>>72440650

>who cares about that artist when this artist is in my opinion better

>>72440650

Objectively David > Iggy

But Iggy singing music David wrote > Anything David has done alone.

>>72440809
Any good recommendations of this?

>>72440980

The idiot/lust for life

>>72440998
Thanks bae. i found a 2 LP version from france and ordered it.

>>72441062

what the fuck just download or stream it you daft cunt, davids dead he won't get any of your money and iggys doing fine

>>72441115
Digital is shit compared to analog, get good cuck. Its not my fault you are too poor to pay for music.

>>72441148

>cuck

You're the one paying some jew for permission to listen to the music of an artist, literally unironically lol

>>72441115
>iggys doing fine
he'll be fine

>>72441196

YOU STOP THAT RIGHT NOW

>>72440492
he lost the ability or inclination to write immortal pop hooks

>>72441172
>paying some jew for
>buying used records
Kek

At one point you've got it and then you lose it and it's gone forever

File: 1479174534251.gif (3MB, 480x270px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 480x270px

>>72440492
This is poor bait, but it's a Bowie thread so I'll bump it anyways.

>>72442461
Bait? Are you saying blackstar is better than hunky dorey?

File: 1429982830716.jpg (297KB, 986x714px) Image search: [Google]

297KB, 986x714px

>>72442527
Actually entirely misread the thing backwards, I need sleep. Still a Bowie thread.

Hunky Dory would have been flawless and even more arguably his best if he just kept Bombers, and it's one of the only pieces of errata that I can find no damn excuse for him cutting it. It was done. It flowed into the next piece. I don't get it. Usually, like with Gouster, there was a reason if he'd shift stuff around, but I haven't found one for Bombers.