Does it deserve to be /mu/ core? How good is it really?

File: Can_-_Future_Days.jpg (59KB, 300x300px) Image search: [Google]

59KB, 300x300px

>>72439422
The fact that these underaged redditors don't want to talk about it just goes to show how good it is

>>72439806
Alright, I'll talk about it
>that reprise about 10 minutes into Bel-Air
I have never ever had a moment in music touch me as much as that part has, holy shit.

>>72439422
It's a pretty good album but the only reason it's /mu/core is because some guy used to spam threads about it every day saying something like "ITT 0/10s" or "albums people pretend to like"

If that's all that qualifies something for /mu/core then Blur deserves to be /mu/ core as well

>>72439422
>>72439806
meme

>>72439806
I love Can and Krautrock but this post is pretty cringeworthy

it is scarufficore

You guys know /mu/ has existed for longer than 2 years right?

>>72441241
What's your point

>>72439422
>implying it has to be good to be /mu/core
w e w

>>72441329
My point is that /mu/core isn't the most popular albums of the last 2 years, but rather albums that have been historically significant in all the time /mu/ has existed.

Hence ITCOTCK belonging on it aswell even though noone talks about it anymore these days.

>>72441607
It cock is talked about all the time, you're crazy