Apparently RYM thinks this review is frontpage material. What

>>72385263
why do rym reviews always reek of numaleness?

>>72385263
lol it sounds good i like it XD: the review

gotta' keep that frontpage steeped in mass appeal

>>72385263
just your average Reddit rym dillentante review desu

http://rateyourmusic.com/~BrushedRed
>Graduated from University of Alabama in Chemical Engineering. I have a profile on other sites like this. Gotta go back through and rerate some albums.. Joy. I enjoy listening to and rating music in my free time. Don't judge my writing skills too harshly. I'm an engineer, not a journalist. Mainly doing this for fun and to keep up with my musical tastes and how that may or may not change over time.

>>72385263
>it's a poem in a rym review episode

shit site

File: IMG_0228.png (15KB, 477x539px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 477x539px

>>72385276
>nary

>>72385301
I'm not even blaming him though, I'm blaming the moderators who thought it was exceptional

Someone really ought to consider messaging the mods via IRC to remove RYM from the sticky.

>>72385314
what

>>72385263
Apparently they think this review is front page material too
>>72315448

glad I dropped RYM a long time ago

>>72385361
jtg actually talks about the music though

>>72385263
Ignoring everything else wrong with this, he spells Souvlaki 'Souvalki'. should disqualify it immediately from any kind of feature

Dunno why you're surprised though, RYM is a fucking cesspit. Why you're even allowed to have a handle in the first place is beyond me, every review should be anonymously submitted and can then be up/downvoted on its individual merits rather than whatever absurd cult of personality the autist behind it has cultivated

As it stands it's just a breeding ground for nobodies to go and stroke their egos. an endless sea of sub-p4k level writers without even the brains to monetize the bollocks they spew.

Fuck it, it's a 5.

>>72385371
Jazz sucks

Mindblowing how people still give in to fanboyism. Album was mediocre as fuck. No different from the droves of other generic shoegaze that's come out in recent years.

>>72385263
Right, I'm going to admit that I read very little in terms of reviews, so what is particularly wrong about this review? From what I can see so far the main issues it has is that it is particularly biased towards the band, exaggerates the material towards being a 5 when it will probably be more like a 3-4 a couple years later and has a couple typos. Is it important for a review to touch on the music theory behind the work? 'Cause I know jack shit in terms of that. I mean, looking at it harder I could write a better review, just saying.

>>72385751
Okay retardo.

>>72385423
Bahahaha btfo