where do I start with her?

>>72383187
with debut, obviously

into the bork zone: bork jams vol. 3 essentials

>>72383187
from the feet and then work your way up?

You don't

Vespertine

>>72383187
right here, dawg.

*grabs crotch*

>>72383207
Wouldn't you want to start from the head and then make your way down? Pleb.

>>72383249
start from the neck
then the back

>>72383207
>>72383249
>>72383259
Start from the legs, then jump up to the upper torso, then move down to the goods.

File: 932935r246.jpg (32KB, 327x364px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 327x364px

>>72383187
you don't
she's mine

>listening to artist's discography in any other way than chronological

>>72383393
what if the first few albums are widely considered to be awful and you don't want to waste your time

>>72383480
listen to them anyway and form your own fucking opinion of them

in the end, who cares if you enjoy them other than yourself

>>72383480
OP asked where do he start with Bjork, so I said that if he is going to listen to whole discography anyway he should do it chronologicaly.

If first albums aren't as good, imo you should listen to them anyway to better understand evolution of the artist and how her/his music was changing throughout the years.

A fucking oak.

File: bjork-1994-renaud-monfourny-07.jpg (132KB, 800x534px) Image search: [Google]

132KB, 800x534px

>>72383324
back off my dude, she's mine ;)