>I don't like this song, it's too repetitive

>>72308765
t. lowercase pro

>i don't like this album, all the songs sound the same

File: 1484170987321.png (55KB, 181x251px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 181x251px

>>72308765
>i don't like this album
>i expected x but got y

>>72308765
Honestly I don't tend to like songs that are extremely repetitive either, though they can be good

File: 1489659981282.png (324KB, 494x484px) Image search: [Google]

324KB, 494x484px

>>72308824
>Album reviews who review an album based on the artists previous material and then arbitrarily decides what the artist should do on the new album based on that instead of actually reviewing the music

I'm looking at you, melon

File: 1424715715486.jpg (37KB, 245x353px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 245x353px

>"It's supposed to be repetitive, you just don't get it"

>>72308879
that's a legitimate defense for some music though
what are you stupid

techno is produced by deaf retards that don't know what composition is, news at eleven

File: clapping music.png (252KB, 518x447px) Image search: [Google]

252KB, 518x447px

>>72308765

>>72308867
>Album reviews where the focus is literally 90% on lyrics, and 10% on music
I'm looking at you, melon, Mr. Mount Eerie, Sun Kil Moon and FJM all got 9s this year

File: 252414.png (2MB, 1151x1413px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1151x1413px

>when does the music start

>>72308765
>>72308798
valid criticism

>>72309706
people who do this are completely missing the point of music. most musicians will even admit they choose lyrics that simply sound good to sing and mean next to nothing