ITT: Albums that you revere and respect for their tantamount impact on the industry, but have not listened to more than once, because, let's face it: deep down, there are other albums you may like to listen to more.
Confess, /mu/!
>>72290491
>niggas on the moon
>atomizer
>"impact on the industry"
what
>>72291309
atomizer did have an impact idiot.
>respect and reverence for albums you've only listened to once
>>72291337
wow after that long and indulgent explanation i totally agree with you
110% Loveless
I'm not going to argue that it's not a good album but I find it too boring to sit through
>>72291309
>>72291369
jesus christ I forgot how literal you cunts are. I didn't mean to imply that every album in my image has only been listened to once or that they all had a major impact to the industry. Loveless is really the focal point of my argument, which is why it's the album Bill's listening to.
The point was to start a discussion, not to pick apart my post for inconsistencies or implications.
>>72291464
Lot's of people wanted to work with Steve Albini that were in other bands because of his guitar sound that was best displayed with atomizer.
Where would Steve Albinis career be without Big Black? Where Atomizer was their recognized success. Everyone sucked steves dick back then, from jesus lizard to butthole surfers to nirvana. Look how many bands mention or are asked about steve albini in american underground.
>>72291737
u sound like a poser mate
anyone can say they revere something
uuh maybe this?`weird thread op