Why's the second disc so much worse?

>>72247545
It's perfect. Appreciate a 10/10 album or GTFO you nonce.

>>72247545
>less mah rawk geetars?
>wow so much worse
kys

Because they're hacks.

28 songs in 120 minutes of all killer and no filler.

How the fuck did Corgan do it?

>>72247713
The second disk isn't bad at all, but I'd be lying if I said I don't prefer the first. Even with gems like 1979 and Stumbleine on the second the first is just so much more energetic and eventful.

>>72247911
>no filler
>the first minute of Porcelina

>>72247960
You mean the band performing the sounds of the ocean before a song that takes place in the ocean?
>>72247950
That's because disc 1 is day, and disc 2 is night.

File: 1462125298387.jpg (31KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 600x600px

>>72247989
>Tonight, tonight
>day

>>72248008
Corgan is talking about what will happen later that night.

Also just look at the discface you fucktard

I must confess, this is one of the few albums i just can't listen in a single session. I have to take a break after 1979.

>3x LP is going for 400$ on discogs
fucking kill me

File: 17760046_219877771824657_404836063332969048_n.jpg (21KB, 422x303px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 422x303px

>>72247545
dude
the second disk is so good what are you even smoking

>>72247679
>10/10
>nasally song intro has "thi wurld isa vampiire"

Choose one you caged rat.

>>72248500
>nasally
So?

>>72248557
So comprehend better. That's probably the least offensive part of a straight 0/10 song.

>>72248500
The world is a fucking vampire, it drains the shit out of me all the time. Annoying place, would rather fuck off to another planet away from all the arseholes but not possible yet.

>>72248596
>0/10 song.
>let me tell others about comprehension
kek

The vinyl version has a completely different track order, and I feel like they spent a lot more time sequencing it. It's a little jarring at first, but I feel like it flows better. Plus, the extra two tracks help.

>>72248608
F>or you.

Nobody thinks this shit is easy. Buy a crash helmet and stop being a mope with objectively 0/10 music.

>>72248651
>and I feel like they spent a lot more time sequencing it
You would be wrong.
>Plus, the extra two tracks help.
Literal filler vinyl bonus tracks so people would buy it

>>72248651
Also tonight reprise is feels as fuck
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IQ9XcBZcVtc

>>72248669
>objectively
How are you measuring that?

>>72248669
Fuck off arsehole. Stop flogging a dead horse.

>>72248703
In an objective non-whiny faggot sense. Squealing about shit with a furrowed brow and heavy guitars.

Lily though? My one and only? Solid fucking track. Same with 33 and 1979.

>>72248733
Get in your spaceship Spaceman Spiff. This world isn't meant f>or you.

>>72248778
>non-whiny
>faggot
>shit
All subjective. Try again.

File: D8A4A594-EA20-4D1C-8B14-170DD5F8B915-3262-00000943255F5B4E.jpg (55KB, 460x320px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 460x320px

>>72247545
Nature kids, they don't have no function

Disc 2 is the best you pleb. It's 10/10 from start to finish

Through the Eyes of Ruby, Stumbleine, XYU is a God tier song streak

Disc 2 has Ruby so it's the best, but the whole album is a fitting farewell to that genre/era of music that essentially died around this time, inadvertently or not. I can't not listen to this album and think of the big picture around it and not be intrigued.

>>72249339
>but the whole album is a fitting farewell to that genre/era of music that essentially died around this time

Please, elaborate.

>>72250117
Not him but i think he means the decline of alt rock.

After this, Alice and Chains and Soundgarden both broke up. Smashing Pumpkins changed their sound drastically, Pearl Jam had a commercial decline, watered down post grunge started to rise and then nu-metal happened and killed it off by 1998.

>>72247545

The whole thing is a masterpiece. Both discs are.

Siamese Dream is miles better
Honestly most of the somber songs are either a hit or miss for me. Songs like stumbeline are a direct hit, others like Lily are a miss.

>>72251441

I think all smashing pumpkings albums are very hard to compare to each other. They are all so different. Different styles and genres. I like MCIS the most, followed by Adore. Most people seem to prefer SD over the rest, but to me - while being a great album - it's inferior to both MCIS and Adore.

MCIS is an album that changes and acquires different meanings for me through time. I have come to love almost every song in both discs. But it has taken a long time for me to fully appreciate it. "Take me down" is the only song that I consider a low point in the album.

>>72251675
>"Take me down" is the only song that I consider a low point in the album.
wow fuck off

>>72251675
I feel the exact same way about the album acquiring different meanings over time. Just listening to it takes me through a journey where I discover new things and make new connections.

I like this album and have tried to like it more than I already do but there are a lot of filler songs. Siamese dream has just as many good songs but without the filler. Like em both

Disc 1 has those first six songs, including the best song on either disc, Here Is No Why. Also has Muzzle and Take Me Down.

Disc 2 has the worst song on either, Tales of a Scorched Earth. But the rest of the songs are good to great, albeit it only has a couple songs I'd rank in the top 7 or 8 overall.

So I think it's roughly even, with only a slight edge to disc 1.

File: Nine_Inch_Nails_-_The_Fragile.png (123KB, 300x300px) Image search: [Google]

123KB, 300x300px

>>72247545
OP here. Sorry guys, I uploaded the wrong photo. Here's the correct one.