>he listens to rock music in a world and time where hip-hop

File: pepe084.jpg (25KB, 400x386px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 400x386px

>>72128478
>hip-hop
>music

>he listens to music in a world and time where silence exists

>he listens to pop music in a world and time where art and folk music exist

OP is just butthurt because no rap verse or bleep bloop can ever match the pure unfiltered euphoria a listener is provided from an incredible guitar riff or a brilliant solo.

>>72128478
Loool its true tho

>>72128527
Fucking kek. Listen to more music, kid.

Also

>solos

>>72128527
>pure unfiltered euphoria
>a guitar riff
i like tool too dude they're great

>>72128582
Have fun in denial sport

Maybe come back to /mu/ when you get through your edgy teenage phase

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6tlSx0jkuLM

>>72128621
Literally dadrock
Pathetic

>>72128619
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KcY3UF6_IaM

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Goy5tAVlv8s

if you dont get pure unfiltered euphoria from either of these riffs then you have legitimately shit taste

>>72128621
>wants to prove rock music is good
>links a Led Zeppelin song

HAHAHAHAHA

File: 1483679477251.png (2MB, 1146x1146px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1146x1146px

>>72128655
>Led Zeppelin? heh, I don't listen to dadrock, I only listen to real new cool hip and p4k approved artists, like arca and lil uzi vert!!

>>72128674
see >>72128700

>>72128662
could've linked space cadet since that song is legitimately good

>Devin Townsend
lmao dude

>>72128734
see >>72128700

>>72128700
just because I like to listen Kendrick Lamar in my cuckshed doesn't mean I'm a numale f-fuck off back to >>>/pol/ you stupid nazi dadrocker!

>>72128700
>If I post the pic of the guy with the dumb hair then I'm right!

>>72128495

>>>/reddit/

led zeppelin objectively sucks ass

File: ContemplativeCage.jpg (5KB, 200x200px) Image search: [Google]

5KB, 200x200px

>>72128700
>that fucking saiyan hair
>ironic glasses
>that hybrid between a neckbeard and a Civil War general's beard
>dirty ass room
>seriously how long is his face?
>that Majora's mask in the background

>>72128827
>objectively
dropped

>>72128789
Kek triggered there, nu-male?

>>72128478
> He can't appreciate all genres
Literally the easiest way to spot a pleb

File: confused stock photo guy.jpg (78KB, 1300x957px) Image search: [Google]

78KB, 1300x957px

Can't I just enjoy bleeps and rock equally like i normally do?

Honestly you really shouldn't have to explain why you listen to something other than "it sounds good".

>>72128956

because autists need something to get angry over that isn't their life's failings

File: 1491616464081.jpg (110KB, 1143x993px) Image search: [Google]

110KB, 1143x993px

>>72128956
This. Music is the most subjective form of art.

>>72128993
sounds like something a pleb would say to justify their shit taste

>>72129044
Not an argument

>>72128993
>>72128977
>>72128956
this is simply not true

music has subjective and objective components and its objective components are just as there as film or photography or whatever

it's kind of hard to be critical of music not because it lacks objectivity, but because it is not that hard to make something that is pretty good, especially within the pop idiom.

and we only really listen to good music-- you're not out there listening to actually bad music like a group of 15 year olds with no talent.

>>72129064
this 1000%

>>72129062
im sorry

>>72129044
Doesn't change anything

File: 1487482550727.png (19KB, 500x590px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 500x590px

>>72128956
This is the usual argument, but I've found more and more I disagree with it. The real reason more, though by no means all or even a majority, of people feel they can objectively value film, is because everyone at least feels they understand the process by which a film is made, even if they really don't. They understand that there's acting, directing, editing etc.... It's kind of like how everyone thinks they understand politics, and thus have a strong opinion about it.
Music, on the other hand, most people seem to think is magic. It's some nebulous art springing forth from the artist's soul, untranslatable into our mortal ways of determining quality. This ignores that much of music making is actually a very mechanical, sloggish, process. It ignores the actual, quantifiable processes of production, and if you don't think lyrics/poetry can be be placed on a continuum between good and bad, I suggest reading some T.S. Elliot and then reading some of the poetry I wrote in middle school.
The fact is most people have little to no education in music or in poetry past high school, and got a pretty shit one while there. They don't understand music, poetry, or art, and so the only level they can appreciate it on, is how it makes them feel. Which, right away I should mention is a completely valid and important way to experience and appreciate art. It's just not objective. Once you add in the fact that music more than anything else, tends to have a deeper personal connection and role in the process of self-identification, particularly when young music can feel like a part of you, it makes it incredibly difficult to have objective conversations about music, but that's not to say it's impossible.

1/2

File: 1485056786934.jpg (263KB, 764x551px) Image search: [Google]

263KB, 764x551px

>>72129124
>>72128956
2/2

Even if you disagree with all the above, I'd hope you'd agree with this, that the argument of "It's all subjective, and everyone likes what they like and there's no such thing as good or bad," has been taken much too far in music. Subjectivity is of course always going to be a factor in enjoyment, but to apply this standard uncritically is to flatten everything into the same homogenous nothing. The Beatles are no better than Nickleback, Silento is as vital as Kendrick Lamar, commercial jingles are as artistically valid as Stravinsky, etc.... We've taken subjectivity to an extreme, in part to validate everyone's personal attachment to the music they love, but this really does ignore the fact that some people really do just have shit taste.

File: 1439389488487.gif (2MB, 243x199px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 243x199px

>>72128478
>he listens to rock music when it evolved into the superior music form of metal a long time ago

>>72129380
t. neckbeard

>>72129140
I agree with you. It's just that the music I listen to is something I think sounds good and that I don't have to force myself to like it unlike just about the entirety of /mu/. I hate the whole "anything is art cus muh subjectivity" bullshit.

this thread is the embodiment of mu

>>72129409
How am I a neckbeard? Neckbeards listen to prog and shitty electronic music. Have you even tried metal?

>>72129124
yeah but I feel like music as an experience is too visceral to argue objectively and have a valid argument one way or another. You can argue the objective elements of a film like its acting, cinematography and script intellectually and have a valid point why a film A is not as good as film B so you should like film B better. However, if something sounds good to you it's harder to argue why something else should sound better to you. It's hard to quantify why music sounds good to us, if it does it does.

> he listens to musicians playing instruments in a world and time where mumblers, babblers and button pushers exist

rock will rise again

>>72128950
We need to stick together against these idiots.

>>72128478
HOLY KEK BATMAN I DIDNHT KNOWS I COULD LIKE MOAR DEN JUAN GENREI

File: maxresdefault.jpg (943KB, 2880x1620px) Image search: [Google]

943KB, 2880x1620px

>>72128478
>he doesn't listen to rock hip-hop bleep bloops

>>72129710
>he fell for the instruments and pushing buttons meme

File: 1477342270751.jpg (103KB, 499x475px) Image search: [Google]

103KB, 499x475px

Do people have a real bias against rock music? Is it just memes?

File: don dokken.jpg (90KB, 770x859px) Image search: [Google]

90KB, 770x859px

>he dosen't listen to glam metal

>>72128478
>he's a frogposter

>>72128527
A+ sarcasm, too bad other replies missed it
have a (You)

>>72129917
it's probably just memes like 98% of the internet

>>72129917
people (boomers, gen x, born in le wrong generation) have a real bias FOR rock music. it even has its own dictionary term - rockism.

>>72130535
So you just answered 'yes'.

>>72130562
if you're a rockist with a persecution complex, then i guess so.

File: image.jpg (58KB, 731x314px) Image search: [Google]

58KB, 731x314px

>listening to rock
>listening to hip hop
>not listening to Welsh drum and bass
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=FY07gklMwf0

>>72129124
>>72129140
Good posts, I more-or-less agree with your general arguments about taking subjectivity too far as to say there's no good or bad

>>72129710
What a pleb!

>>72128795
t. never been to reddit
i guess that's a good thing

>>72132270
its a good site

>>72129789
>listening to watered down and shitty versions of all 3 marketed by cartoons

>>72128500
Tfw have tinnitus

>>72129124
>>72129140
Nice copypasta, faggot.