If Oasis is the Beatles of the 90s, whose the beatles of the 2000s?

>>72057686
>whose the beatles of the 2000s?
kanye or beyonce

the jonas brothers

Radiohead or the killers

coldplay

>>72057722
Honestly this.

what about the arctic monkeys?

Assuming that's not an insult, AnCo.

to be the beatles you have to revolutionize music

Scooter

>>72057950
AnCo sound more like The Beach Boys

>>72057955
so coldplay

Tame Impala

>>72057686
Your premise is wrong. Oasis were never The Beatles of the '90s. They just copied a few riffs, licks and tricks, and mentioned them a lot in interviews. They couldn't have innovated their way out of a paper bag.

Radiohead is the nearest we have to The Beatles today.

>>72058141
If Radiohead were known by everyone, yes, but they aren't anywhere near a household name.

>>72057686
The Strokes

>>72058215
Radiohead were far more popular than Oasis ever were.

>>72058530
They hardly register on the Beatles popularity scale though.

>>72058569
Neither do Oasis. They may be a household name in the UK, but barely anyone (at least if we're considering random people who may not be all that into music) in the US know them apart from Wonderwall and maybe a couple other songs from that same album.

>>72057955
then Gorillaz

>>72057686
Probably Coldplay, only band that really stayed relevent long enough. Also a band that made normal people get exited for their next album.

>>72057686
what I want to know is, if oasis was the beatles of the 90s, who was the rolling stones of the 90s?

>>72057686
Grimes
>>72060433
Grimes

>>72060433
blur

>>72060437
1/10 made me reply

>>72060433
probs nirvana.

Gorillaz

>>72058042
probably this

The lemon twigs

There hasn't been a Beatles of any other decade. No Artist or group post "The Beatles" era has had the influence or staying power of The Beatles.