redpill me on rango brahms

He's the second worst Beatles member

File: christgau4.jpg (24KB, 300x225px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 300x225px

Sentimental Journey [Apple, 1970]

For over-fifties and Ringomaniacs only--the reports that he did this collection of standards for his mums appears to be true. C

Beaucoups of Blues [Apple, 1970]

Finally he gets to impersonate Buck Owens for an entire record. I admit that over the distance he doesn't merely sing flat--sometimes the voice threatens to fade away altogether. But both the songs and Pete Drake's production bespeak a high-quality obsession--the music sticks. And Ringo is still Ringo, which means he's good at making himself felt. B

Ringo's Rotogravure [Atlantic, 1976]

This fellow sounds as if he can use a band. Do you think Leon Russell could drum one up? C+

Ringo the 4th [Atlantic, 1977]

The realization that people will buy this depressing record just because it was made by a Beatle saddens me. Only they didn't because for all intents and purposes, it never finished higher than 199 on Billboard's end of year chart, which was no doubt some statistician paying his respects. C-

Everything Rocks and Nothing Ever Dies [1990s]

File: 91283477.jpg (16KB, 363x413px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 363x413px

herb gerrison was the better

>>71949649
He's not wrong. Literally all of Ringo's good solo career material came out as a charting single, so just get a best-of collection and call it a day.

As songwriters
John>=Paul>>>George>ringo

As musicians
Paul>>>>Ringo>George>>>>john

>>71949580
As a solo artist his singles were better than his albums, and mostly only in the beginning.

>>71950653
Him and George spent the early 70s dumping all the unused songs they'd written over the years onto their solo albums. Once those were exhausted...

>>71950680
George did bounce back though.

>>71950695
Not really. I mean, the S/T was ok if it had come out in 1971 instead of 78. Too late by then.

>>71950617
>>>>>john
literally kys yourself