what is your guilty pleasure music? pic related

File: 43243.jpg (47KB, 645x968px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 645x968px

having a "guilty pleasure" is for plebs who are scared of what people think

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ydkw0SoU7nQ

File: 1422574102631.png (200KB, 600x451px) Image search: [Google]

200KB, 600x451px

>>71936237
protip for sad anon: a guilty pleasure is also something you know is bad but enjoy anyway

mine is Dance with the Dead, a fuckin synthwave band

>>71936483
If you enjoy it then you don't think it's bad.
Bad doesn't mean anything in art anyway

File: anberlin.jpg (827KB, 1200x627px) Image search: [Google]

827KB, 1200x627px

>>71936214
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F1G6qRQYu0U

I just gotta sing to it, man. I can't help it.

>>71936625
kek if you cant discern the quality of something from the enjoyment you get out of it

File: Faith No More 'Introduce Yourself' Cover.jpg (3MB, 2278x2243px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 2278x2243px

>>71936214

Chuck Mosley era Faith No More.

>>71936813
there's no point in trying to do that, it's stupid, it's autistic, it's cuckoldry
because if you enjoy it, you can assume there are favorable qualities about it that, all of which just as valid as the next, you probably just can't put your finger on what those are like a music reviewer would have to

>>71936920
>it's cuckoldry

Jesus christ, dude.

File: 1485234345617.jpg (34KB, 480x522px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 480x522px

>>71936920

Not particularly embarrassed by anything I listen to but I suppose I like blink 182 way too much for a 20 year old

https://youtu.be/yUIGqjohSo8

File: Crying laughing classic pepe.jpg (11KB, 248x187px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 248x187px

>>71936920
>implying objectively good and bad art doesn't exist

>>71936943
it's thinking that your own impression has to be second to some intersubjective/cultural idea of what "good music" is. granted your impression is gonna be shaped by that in some way but you're also inevitably gonna get to *some* unpopular opinions and those aren't necessarily worthless or unfounded. but no you're just too afraid some people are gonna laugh at you for blasting MCR, and for no actual reason at that
>>71937262
>>71937433
if objectively good and bad art exist there could theoretically be an objectively good artwork that literally no one likes. is there something like that, what would you say?