>claims to be jazz fan >doesn't listen to live recordings

Live =/= Better

>>71934631
Nobody implied that you berry

>>71934631
He didn't say better.

>>71934650
According to OP, not listening to live recording means you're not a "real" jazz fan. Kind of implies that they are better, doesn't it?

>>71934691
no the implication is that they are as vital as studio recordings

>>71934691
it doesn't imply that at all. at the very most, it would imply that they're equal.

File: Screen Shot 2016-08-11 at 10.36.14 PM.png (718KB, 604x688px) Image search: [Google]

718KB, 604x688px

>claims to be jazz fan
>listens to or skips albums based on the cover art

What are some good live jazz albums?

>>71934954
Monk with Coltrane
Full House by Wes Montgomery

>>71934608

>implying I don't love the shit out of Coltrane's Live In Japan

File: 1401751940027.jpg (44KB, 598x608px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 598x608px

>>71934608
>claims to be a jazz fan
>hasn't composed and recorded a multi platinum record

File: R-6580163-1422439986-6918.jpeg.jpg (128KB, 600x589px) Image search: [Google]

128KB, 600x589px

>>71934848
I never would have listened to Ray Barretto's Indstructible if not for that great cover art.

>claims to be a jazz fan
>listens to 'albums'