What do audiophiles do when an album is only available in 320kbps MP3?

Audiophiles don't listen to rap mixtapes.

this album sucks tb h

Be happy because it's already high enough.
It's like people saying they can see a difference between 90 fps and 120+ fps. I personally don't think people can see frames over 60 fps. But maybe I'm just a slow seer.

File: 1436082378_1408058569692s.jpg (6KB, 231x244px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 231x244px

>>71934155
Fake thread made just so they could post the pic of this fake ass (((rapper)))

>>71934208
>facebook file name
It checks out.

>>71934187
You can tell the difference between 60 and 120+ even on a 60hz moniter. Play some old game you can get 300 or so fps on and then cap it to 60 without vsync. You can tell the difference

File: 9mages.jpg (3KB, 83x90px) Image search: [Google]

3KB, 83x90px

>>71934249
>2017
>not using google images as your rare pepe cloud
>trying to push these bogus Israeli puppet rappers

just fuck your shit up Schilmo

Commit suicide

>>71934187
This is not an apt comparison as in computing if your machine generates say 300 frames and your monitor refreshes 60 times a second, everytime it refreshes, your monitor pulls the frame that was last generated by your machine and displays it. If there are more frames being generated, it can pull a more recent frame, even if it is more recent by only a couple ms, it makes a difference. If your machine is only generating 60 frames, the frame the monitor pulls may not be as recent.

grab it and transcode it down to V0 anyway because I don't hear artifacts

>>71934466
this

>>71934164
K E K

>>71934171
TH IS

>>71934155
audiophiles aren't 14 year olds who listen to such drivel

>>71937885
*tips*