Why is every other composer so shit in comparison?

Because they let him steal their music.

They're not close enough to our Lord.

Because you think having a self referential, exhaustive, contained oeuvre is sexy

Mozart >>>>> Beathoven > Bach

>>71874354
They didn't write as much music?

>>71875803
Wrong faggot

>>71875809
Writing a lot of music means you have a higher chance of writing great music. Bach wrote every day for the majority of his life.

His combination of lyricism, flawless harmony, form and precision also helped.

File: 15139229_913992128731201_278305885_n.jpg (32KB, 600x450px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 600x450px

>>71875707
>Wolfgang "50 Minutes of nothing Symphonies" Amadeus Mozart
>Better than Beethoven and even more offensive, better than Bach
At least pretend you know what you're talking about.

>>71875887
>Ludwig van ''Pompous overblown le dissonance music'' Beethoven
>Better than the subtelty of Mozart's Piano Concertos

>>71875887
>mozart
>50 minute symphonies

File: nope.jpg (53KB, 500x521px) Image search: [Google]

53KB, 500x521px

I love that smug nigga

Pi unrelated

>>71875707
Literally the opposite of that desu.

File: musicsales-HL00103663_4.jpg (82KB, 500x667px) Image search: [Google]

82KB, 500x667px

>>71874354

>>71876079
>muh subtly

Hanz Zimmer is better.

Any decent Romantic composer is way better.

Rach, Chopin, Mahler. Shit even Shostakovich.

Bach, Mozart, Beethoven are all babby's first classical/pleb.