>says music is subjective >only listens to critically

File: 1490385562393.jpg (65KB, 625x415px) Image search: [Google]

65KB, 625x415px

>>71873295
>claims his favorite album is ""objectively"" better because the artist wrote and produced everything alone

>>71873295
i subjectively agree with all of those critics

>>71873329
/thread
it is really that simple

>>71873329
I see no reason why this doesnt make sense to op

>>71873329
>denial

>>71873697
>>71874325
brainlets

File: 1465975274458.jpg (4KB, 175x152px) Image search: [Google]

4KB, 175x152px

>he follows rym avg ratings

File: 1437531606064.jpg (18KB, 350x350px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 350x350px

>>71873329
>>71873697

>>71873295
There's not necessarily a contradiction in those two statements. You may think that music is entirely subjective and therefore other people's opinions shouldn't affect your personal judgement, but you can still get album recommendations based on critical acclaim and not be a hypocrite, because the fact that an album is critically acclaimed means that there's a much higher chance that you'll like it as well. It would be hypocritical if you looked for critically acclaimed albums because you thought that gave them some sort of "objective standard of quality".

if you only listen to critically acclaimed albums then you should probably kill yourself

>>71874901
You first