Albums that either need a repress or need to get cheaper

File: folder.jpg (2MB, 1420x1424px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1420x1424px

1972 reissue sucks

i came across druhks is pretty bad shape a couple years ago for 40.

>>71813829

Even I, a person who rarely pirates, find this comment odd and quaint.

It seems like people in the thread so far are only referring to vinyl. But there is exactly one re-issue that needs to happen:

>>71813889

SAW II needs to be released as a triple-CD set, containing all 25 original and unexpurgated 25 tracks, in their proper fucking sequence with original artwork and all.

It is a horrible pity that an album with such a conspicuous visual design scheme has had that scheme /nakedly thwarted/ by the removal of one of the best tracks, plus another, on many occasions. If I were the artist, I would be bothered about it.

Last I checked /even the US Rhino >>71813889 (1972) re-issue /miserably fucking fails at an obvious fucking task/ by not even completely re-issuing all 25 tracks on a vinyl version. Such dogshit.

damn, i have that vinyl too
didn't know it was worth so much

>>71813829
The CD wasn't that expensive though

>>71817076
I thought p4k just reviewed the reissue

File: 00602537554430-cover-zoom.jpg (325KB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]

325KB, 1000x1000px

This with the original vinyl tracklist and album art.

can't believe he sampled kanye

seriously what a fuckign hack

>>71817683
hey are you as nervous about transitioning into high school after summer as i am? :/

File: 1477438445790.png (434KB, 618x718px) Image search: [Google]

434KB, 618x718px

>>71817691
no more worried i am that i'm going to slip in slide ur moms vaginal canal

haha