Why did classical composers suck so much ass at naming their

>>71808003
Those are just the catalogue numbers for each album you fucking dumbass. He was signed to Atlantic Records

>>71808003
They cared more about the music than projecting an image that would appeal to teenagers.

>>71808052
You can still at least name your shit anon.
Like all the classical painters did, or maybe they sold out too in your world

>>71808052
No, if they did care they would have used names because they consider their music own.
Bach was a faggot and even the faggots from XL Recording rejected him.

>>71808003
Naming a work colours how a person perceives or plays it. When you don't have that framework, you can project whatever emotions and narratives you want onto a piece.

>>71808123
>>71808149
Good music can stand on its own without needing to be representational or programmatic

>>71808189
Second anon here.
I don't give a shit about names and I was just shitposting if it wasn't obvious enough.
See ya'.

>>71808178
Yeah, and naming it after a powerpoint presentation definitely colors it as some dry shit

classical music sucks in general.

File: black-woman-attitude_4523[1].jpg (26KB, 320x263px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 320x263px

>>71808273

>>71808246
Calling something "Symphony No. 7" shouldn't affect how you hear it at all. The thing would be untitled if that wouldn't make it impossible to talk about an artist's work.
This is either pure autism or lame trolling.

>>71808417
>Calling something "Symphony No. 7" shouldn't affect
but it does, theory =/= reality. You're the autistic one

>>71808273
little baby bird brains is this guys name

>>71808123
It has a name, it being "Symphony No. 4".

File: hqdefault[1].jpg (10KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 480x360px

>>71808492

>>71808559
That's not a name, it's a cop out

>>71808273
modern classical tho