ITT: Future classics
>>71786127
depression cherry and s/t are better than that easily
>>71786127
>>71786127
I'm completely OK with this.
Teen Dream is objectively superior though, and Depression Cherry + TYLS are my current favs.
>>71786127
>>71786139
>>71786144
no beach house album will ever be a "classic"
you can like them and acknowledge this
>>71786167
>Implying the 2010's doesn't have extremely low standards for what counts as "a classic".
Here's a legit one though.
>>71786192
tbf that album is underrated by all. weird how an actual sjw album is barely talked.
not even p4k reminds us about it
>future classic
nice meme
>>71786215
>actual SJW album
If you actually listen to some of the interviews from around when it came out, it becomes fairly clear that the SJW shit is layered in SUCC-levels of irony and it's all as much about taking the piss out of the SJWs as it is in support of them.
But yeah, as solid a contender as ever for AOTD, it's one of the few since 2010 that were truly "fresh" sounding.
Teen Dream > Devotion > Depression Cherry = Bloom > rest
this is objectively correct btw
>>71786192
I don't get what's supposed to be so great about this
>>71786192
even if it wont end up a future classic its already a classic compression artifact-core album
>>71786289
Bloom=TD>TYLS>Devotion>DC>s/t
Bloom has better songs but they get boring after a while, however TD is still great after many listens
>>71786127
Beach House is a study in how many times a band can make nearly the exact same album
>>71786387
tbf that describes like 95% of /mu/'s beloved bands
>>71786402
wrong
>>71786387
sticking to a formula isn't exactly bad
The Quietus has a great article on Beach House talking exactly about this
>>71786420
>sticking to a formula isn't exactly bad
There comes a point when it's too much, and Beach House crossed that line.
>>71786477
I disagree. Their songwriting, while sticking to a similar structure throughout most of their albums, is always evolving. Listen to similarly structured songs from Devotion and Depression Cherry, from instance, an you can see a clear progression.
>>71786563
TYLS is also radically different than DC in terms of songwriting, and I'd argue it's their most different sounding album yet, and sounds utterly nothing like s/t or Devotion.
>>71786603
>and sounds utterly nothing like s/t or Devotion.
kind of a ridiculous statement. just because their songwriting improves doesn't mean their sonic palette has changed
also devotion is still their best album
>>71786142
this 100%
>>71786142
>>71786652
>implying Person Pitch isn't already a classic.
The intro to Take Pills still brings me to tears, it's so ethereally beautiful.
I think Giles Corey will be considered better than Deathconciousness over time.
>>71786142
This.
>>71786675
no it won't. it's far less ambitious, and while somewhat original it repeats itself too often to be as interesting
>>71786675
Pitchfork didn't even review this. nobody will remember it
>>71787162
>Scaruffi
>relevant
lol
>>71786306
its an awesome album...
>>71787186
oh now i get it
>>71787219
lol no
>>71786306
Listen to the best parts of Deep Cuts and all Silent Shout. Once you really love their old material, listen to Fever Ray.
Then, listen to Tomorrow, in A Year.
Finally, listen to Raging Lung and everything that comes after it.
Now, you realize why STH is so completely beyond god-tier.
>>71786127
more like current classic
>>71786167
true it's just predictable dreampop it's not really breaking any boundaries
>>71787116
Who still listens to this btw?
>>71786814
>>71787094
It's the most accurate self-portrayal of depression since Down Colorful Hill and Pink Moon. Deathconciousness is musically great, yeah, but most of the songs are way to aggressive to be depressing.
>>71787374
take the red pill, r plus seven is way better
>>71787311
>For an album to become a classic, people should still be listening to it 2 years later!
TVUN sold 30,000 copies but it is one of the most critically acclaimed and influential albums of all time.
>>71787427
doesn't that prove his point dumbass
>>71787427
Influential? This word is thrown around a lot when it comes to Kendrick. Remind me how this is influential plz
>>71787355
>It's the most accurate self-portrayal of depression
literally meaningless
> but most of the songs are way to aggressive to be depressing.
ha, as if more or less depressing is a metric of quality, or, much less, of influence?
>>71787374
>>71787418
take the redpill, pic related is the best thing hes done
>>71787311
I've only ever watched my favorite movie once. Replay value doesn't dictate quality.
>>71787584
are you kidding me. movies and fucking music can't be measured the same
of course you're going to watch a movie once. you already have figured out the plot
replay value is an accurate measure of quality. if it wasn't we wouldn't be even on this board jfc.
>>71787561
>way more emotionally powerful.
literally meaningless
>way more emotionally powerful.
ha, as if emotional power is a metric of quality, or, much less, of influence?
Yeah. It is.
>>71787608
You don't have any albums that you really liked and consider really good, that you don't really feel the need to listen to again?
Do you just require multiple listens to appreciate anything?
>>71786387
Bloom and Teen Dream sound utterly different.
>>71787584
>>71786192
Nice I've never seen that version of the cover.
But yes, this.
>>71786142
Definitely on its way to classic. I'm going to predict its not going to age well though.
>>71787116
This for sure.
>>71787311
me, you dick.
>>71787374
Maybe. I think this might get overlooked.
>>71787629
>You don't have any albums that you really liked and consider really good, that you don't really feel the need to listen to again?
no, if that was the case they wouldn't be my fav albums.
its cool, if you wanna listen to 2 music like its some rare trading card that needs to be sealed away in a super secret case. but I don't enjoy my music that way. if I like it on the first listen damn right I'm going to play it over and over.
>>71787616
well i don't know what to say other than history will likely prove you wrong. also you're probably listening to music for different reasons from most listeners
>>71787678
It's the LP version of the STH cover, as the LP is arguably the definitive version with that album.
I'm going to actually say though that Person Pitch is going to age a hell of a lot better than MPP has.
>>71786675
wrong!
>>71787680
I mean there are some movies I can watch over and over and over again and they're still good, like Fury Road or The Raid or Shrek 2. And there are some movies I saw once and never felt the need to watch again, too. If you don't do that with movies or music then hey we're just different like that.
>>71786127
Agree
>>71786142
I think it turned 10 years old just recently? Pretty sure its already a classic, also I love it
>>71786675
I don't think this will ever measure up to Deathconsciousness, sorry famalam. Giles Corey was just kind of standard depressing, ambient, folksy, dark music. Deathconsciousness was such an ambitious fusion of shoegazing, dark ambient, post-rock, post-punk etc etc etc.
>>71787116
Unfortunately this is true.
>>71787629
multiple listens is absolutely necessary to appreciate the nuances of a detailed album. opinions on albums can change drastically with relistening, and if you only listen to albums once, i guarantee you've written off a number of them that you'd like upon relistening
>>71787718
nah not saying you can't rewatch movies. but in music terms i can replay the same album 3times in the same day. where with movies thats not going to happen till maybe a month later.
i understand why tpab is a classic to everybody. but its not my fav album
Underrated
>>71787116
Hopefully once the pendulum has finally completed its hard swing to the right and /po/-tier views that once formed the backbone of the 2010's internet counterculture are normalized everywhere, people will feel OK calling TPAB, Lemonade, and similar tripe the transparent attempts by the Jewish record industry to market trendy black strife to perpetually guilt-tripped white people in an attempt to make them overlook the massive cultural failings of an entire racial group that they actually are.
jimmer in gen. (just like frogs/
>>71787765
When I say TPAB doesn't have replay value, I'm not saying its bad because it doesn't have replay value. Its just one of those albums that I listened to once, understood, and don't really feel the need to revisit. The poetry recital that comes before almost every track makes for a really cool concept album, but it gets really heavy and sometimes feels like it goes on too long. Its not something I feel the need to experience again. Its kind of like The Gift from TVU's White Light/White Heat. When you know a spoken word story start to finish, hearing it get recited again can feel really drawn out, even if the story is good and enjoyable the first time.
Its also not really the happiest record all the time, the the last 1/3 is pretty bleak in particular.
>>71787851
i can only hope
it's a classic for me though
>>71787884
i feel the same way about tpab
The SJW's will be genocided after the future civilization finds out how unappreciated it was at its time
>>71787938
Agreed.
there won't be any classics in the future because the proliferation of the internet and easier music distribution means that music as an art form will become so saturated as to render a particular album unable to satisfy a large consensus of people
>>71787938
tru
>>71786675
DC = 9.5
GC = 10
fact
>>71786814
>far less ambitious
nah
>>71786675
giles corey manages to have even worse production than deathconsciousness. you'll've grown out of it by this time next year.
>>71787116
Yes
>>71787374
No, R+7 will be considered a true classic years from now
>>71786127
Under no circumstances.
>>71786142
Possibly.
>>71786192
Who the fuck cares about The Knife? No.
>>71786675
No.
>>71787116
Already is regarded as a classic.
>>71787219
No one takes her seriously.
>>71787374
Probably not.
>>71787678
Is this not regarded as a classic?
>>71787694
Who the fuck listens to Deerhunter?
>>71787938
I hope.
>>71787978
Nah.
>>71788852
TBK will definitely be regarded as a classic
and what do you have against Deerhunter and The Knife? Both of those albums are stellar.
>>71786142
>>71787116
>>71787678
>>71790450
yes
>>71787355
Who cares if it's depressing?
Musical quality > any other aspect
>>71788852
Talk about a fucking contrarian post.
You know its true
>>71789143
Most boring album I've heard in a long time. The fact that it's an r&b album makes it that much more disappointing. The guy sound like he's TRYING to be an r&b singer. It lacks hooks or anything memorable at all.
>>71791540
>It's boring because it's quiet
How the fuck is this boring? It's one of the most experimental r&b albums ever and you can bet on it being one of the most influential.
>>71791619
It's boring because Frank just let's the songs drone on without any progression. I obviously think he's not a good enough vocalist to keep my attention with vocals alone so... Also, just because it's "experimental"(pitch shifted vocals omg, r&b song has acoustic guitar, song doesn't have drums, his album credit list looks like MBDTF, OMG) doesn't mean crap. I doubt this will be as influential as an album such as "Take Care". I swear hipsters wouldn't know good r&b if it slapped them in their faces.
>>71787572
>not this
disgusting
>>71789143
did people really like this or were they just high on "where's the album" memes
>>71792417
>hipsters as an insult
This meme needs to die, you immediately lose any credibility when you bring that up
>>71792477
Nah I liked it a lot desu, one of the best albums I've heard released during my lifetime.
>>71792417
Enlighten us to 'good' R&B senpai
>>71792505
Hipster=white people
>>71792588
Well that's even more retarded
Top 10 best albums of this decade 2bh
>>71786127
heh no
>>71792417
this guy is correct
channel orange is way better than blond btw
>>71792645
Objectively wrong
>>71791529
wtf am i looking at
>>71792657
lackluster, narcisistic experimentalism and lazy songwriting
vs
proficient songwriting with just enough formal experimentation while maintaining broad appeal and catchiness inherent to r&b
there really is no dispute. only people who prefer blonde are p4k readers who know jackshit about both r&b and experimental music
>>71787442
no, dumbass
the Gizz will prevail
>>71792544
I get more feels out of Sufjan Stevens singing(probably the most contrived anal retensive falsetto I can think of) than Franks
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=dsGODTySH0E
This senpai :)
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=rhI904iejqQ
>>71787608
>not being post-plot
oh boy, highschooler detected.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oeK9OZ5M1oU
The whole album is practically on a Portishead/Massive Attack level
This mofo:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n3f5Y74XCQE
>>71786127
Nah
>>71786142
Nah
>>71786192
I hope so, definetly deserves it but it's innovation might take a while to settle.
>>71786675
Nah
>>71787116
Yep
>>71787219
Nah
>>71787374
Probably for ambient-heads
>>71787678
Yeah
>>71787694
Personally would go with Microcastle. But I see the appeal of Halcyon
>>71787938
Probably not
>>71787978
Yeah, well at least STFTB status
>>71789143
Too early to tell but I'd have to say No
>>71790450
Nope
>>71791529
Yeah, I think this will stick
>>71792625
Love it, but not a classic. It's a pretty top their art pop album though
>>71792786
Nope
>>71793291
Feels bad to break the news to you but all of the albums on your chart have already been forgotten
>>71790450
yes
I'm more interested in trying to figure out which albums everyone ignores or considers bad at this point in time but will be regarded as a classic 50 years from now
Sorta like what happened to TVU&N
>>71794611
julian casablancas and the voidz - tyranny
dean blunt - the redeemer
clarence clarity - no now
sophie - product
john maus - we must become the pitiless censors of ourselves
htrk - psychic 9-5 club
liturgy - ark work
Who else got shilled this by youtube?
It's genuinely great
>>71793291
>I love sucking pitchfork's dick the chart
>>71792786
This album won't be but King Gizz are gonna be hailed as one of the best Psych Rock (or just rock) bands of the 2010s
>>71795210
>john maus - we must become the pitiless censors of ourselves
So you're an MDE fan, good lad.
>>71792588
lol
>>71786127
>>71786192
>>71787116
>>71787978
>>71790530 (already is)
>>71787678
yes
>>71786675
possibly
>>71787374
R+7
>>71787694
if not this album then one of their others
>>71789143
no
>>71790450
" "
>>71792625
honestly i see any of her other albums becoming classics over that one though
>>71795260
actually good album but not a classic at all
>>71793291
>i just started browsing /mu/ last year
>>71792869
Ridiculously underrated album. Amazing production, deep vocals, groundbreaking fusions of genres.
Groundbreaking innovation with the genres and bass music, I just hope they produce another album some day and didn't get discouraged by the lack of reception.
Roses is my favourite track from it.
If it's not already considered a classic it will be by 2020
>>71786142
this
>>71787116
unfortunately
>>71786675
literally who
>>71792625
if there is any justice in this world
>>71796730
Has as much of a chance as everything else posted in this god awful thread
>>71787219
Yes
>>71787374
Just a footnote
>>71787678
No
>>71787694
No
>>71787938
Maybe
>>71787978
No
>>71789143
No
>>71790530
Already a classic
>>71791529
YES
>>71792625
Maybe
>>71795260
No
>>71786192
No
>>71786142
Yes
>>71786127
Maybe
>>71786127
>a classic in the making
this one is having a huge influence on hip hop's current landscape
>>71792692
lackluster = your opinion
narcisistic experimentalism = doesn't make sense
lazy songwriting = your opinion + doesn't make sense
overall a trash message
Admit it
>>71787969
this is correct, I've felt it. god is dead
>>71795678
Glad you like it too m8! Ridiculously underrated indeed
They just released a new album btw, its quite something - enjoy
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uf1DhUhra2I
>>71797091
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AqNdXmjZgLk
>>71797091
Sweet, I'll give it a listen asap. My day couldn't get better now.
>>71786139
I'll take Shitty Opinions Plebs Have for 500.
>>71797308
t.pitchfork drone
>>71797318
not even him, but dc isn't quite there, it's close. s/t isn't even on the same plane.
>>71797100
I first listened to this album a few weeks ago. Someone hook me up with similar stuff.
>>71797338
no its way better. but of course of the low ratings this board is quick to dismiss them. this is their best song to date https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lhJpXouayE4
>>71797349
try his whole discography dumbass :)
memerap classic
>>71797365
>being worse than the "not here to spoonfeed" people
>>71797349
Listen to Ravedeath next
>>71797416
idk how dumb you can be to not even bother looking up the artist on fucking wikipedia after he liked the album.
or he could have just went on rateyourmusic and just listen to his highest rated albums.
#make/mu/elitistagain
>>71797434
What the holy fuck is the point of /mu/ then?
You sound like you just past your first few months here and think you know everything now
>>71797470
been here since 2011 buddy.
>>71786127
Too bad they were a one-album wonder of Guns n' Roses proportions
>>71797483
>.jpg
>>71787635
What on earth are you talking about? You could swap the tracks out between albums and nobody would be able to tell the difference.
>>71797632
yes
>>71797100
maybe
>>71796948
probably but imo they have better
>>71796909
likely
>>71792869
i wish
>>71790530
>>71787678
already is
>>71795260
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2XP1jHPp_kQ
this is objectively the better youtubecore album
>>71786142
DUDE
REVERB
LMAO
seriously this album is so shit, thnaks for reminding me why I don't come on this board
Personal opinions aside
>>71786127
no
>>71786142
no
>>71786192
maybe if people listen to it
>>71787116
definitely
>>71787219
no way
>>71787374
maybe
>>71787678
maybe
>>71787978
probably
>>71790530
already is
>>71792786
no
>>71796948
probably
>>71797100
yes
>>71786127
Probably Future's best.
>>71796867
very low IQ rebuttal