How many layers of post-punk are you on right now?

>>71782036
post punk sucks

I see post punk thrown around all the time and I'm pretty sure it's in line with my tastes but if someone played some for me I wouldn't feel confident labeling it as such. That said, I'm behind 7 layers of post punk.

>>71782064
that's a lot of layers

Listened to every album on all the charts and want more. Where to start bros?

>>71782068
post-punk is a really vague and loose term really

Post-Punk is the dumbest label. (There's a lot of great music categorized under it though.)

>>71782326
is it really that vague? -- 32 layers of post punk.

File: SUCC.jpg (94KB, 442x441px) Image search: [Google]

94KB, 442x441px

>>71782068
You are like a little baby

watch this:

>>71782036
I'm post-post-post-post-post-post-punk right now

my dude

666 layers. Post punk isn't that vague if you just look at it as literally post 1977 punk (77-84) not including the hardcore punk scene of course which lasted about the same time but had its own very distinct sound.