I don't get it
Its a guitar
>>71772919
Turn it up extremely loud, it helps too if you're fucked up preferably on weed or acid. And keep in mind when I say loud I mean LOUD. Then close your eyes and listen into the music. Listen to the *sound* of it and not the songwriting.
>>71772919
i never got it either
>>71772919
>>71773000
It's supposed to put you into a trance like state
>>71772976
like how much loud do you mean exactly?
>>71773025
I mean
L O U D
O
U
D
Overrated
>>71772919
It's good but it's no Seance
>>71773032
holy fRICK THATS LOUD
>>71773047
>>71773053
horrible opinions
Gave it ten minutes at max volume on headphones. Proto-emo wankology for chronic masturbators.
>>71773078
Literally it needs to be loud enough to where you go deaf after the snare intro to Only Shallow. That way you don't need to hear the album at all
>>71773096
Chronic masturbator here. I can confirm that I love this album
To me is not a weed or lsd album, maybe alcohol, but definitely you need to be in a certain set of mind to get it, only not drug related.
You had to hear it when it came out: it's aged like milk.
>>71772919
They have better albums, this one is just overhyped mediocrity.
There is nothing profound to get. It's just fucking sounds good in a way nothing else out there does.
>>71774983
Would you recommend Isn't Anything or mbv? I listened to Loveless yesterday on speakers and I wasn't that blown away. I'm planning on listening to it on headphones now, to get a different perspective on it.
>>71775317
You can't go wrong with either one, though I'd pick Isn't Anything.
>>71775940
Thank you. I've finished listening to it the second time now, on headphones. My opinion on the album as a whole hasn't changed very much, although I Only Said is a work of a mad genius in my opinion. Do any of their other albums have similar songs?
>>71773427
Oh really? Name me literally one shoegaze album that sounds as good as Loveless
is this a sad album?
>>71775317
>I listened to Loveless yesterday on speakers and I wasn't that blown away.
Loveless is an album I didn't immediately love at first, but as I listened to more music, I found it more and more impressive that Loveless managed to reach a sound that is so unique and other bands haven't even gotten close to replicating.
>>71776058
Not really. It's more dreamy and ethereal.
>>71776058
it is for me, i listened to this with my ex the first day we met and spent time together.
It helps if you gain an appreciation for 80s dream pop and alt rock. Loveless is a revolution while also sounding like the culmination of all that came before it.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iFp7W3PoNPI
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OKDwJOdq3zU&list=PL4kQzuvLbppdpm73eE7P6-K9tBgU4kzOZ
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=29TJbZmHUgo
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mjOVICqIpjQ
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PVwJMOtfJbU
>>71772919
The first song was kinda cool but after that it became just a wall of sound and I turned it off. That's my experience with this album. Maybe I should revisit it.
>>71776244
Yeah, you should, preferably with good headphones.
>>71772919
its okay not to like something over people like
>>71773427
the only song that sounds slightly dated is soon because of the electronic drumming at the start
and that song is unbelievably good
>>71773047
this
You literally have to be somebody who only listens to music every once in a while to not get an album as easy to get as this
>>71776244
If you don't like the wall of sound, you won't like the album. I'd recommend trying to appreciate it. The guitars on I Only Said are fantastic.
>>71773370
Light opiates
What is with people saying every album slightly out of the ordinary is a "drug album" or you have to be fucked up? Can you not pay attention without being stoned?
>>71776831
No they can't.
>>71776057