>ONE DAY I AM GONNA GROW WINGS >GOD LOVES HIS CHILDREEEEEEEN

>>71748661

(You)

>>71748714
Read those lyrics over.

TRY to pretend those wouldn't fit perfectly into a my chemical romance or 21 pilots song.

>>71748728
It's not really about your little selection of decontextualized lyrics. It's more about the sum of an entire piece, in which case Radiohead is light years ahead of either of those bands.

>>71748661
this isnt even a remotely close music context. its like comparing the smiths to tears for fears

I thought the album was about becoming complacent with life.

File: you what.jpg (11KB, 255x200px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 255x200px

I get that you're trying to make people mad but this straight up doesn't make any sense

I'm not even a radiohead fan, but this is retarded. If this isn't bait you should feel bad about yourself

>>71748905
>Radiohead is light years ahead of either of those bands.
>Radiohead
>ahead of my chemical romance and 21 pilots

>>71748956
You listen to tears for fears, letting me know you're under 21. opinion = discarded

>>71748993
>>71749063
>>71748743
>>71748714
I don't understand how it's possibly for simple quotes from a song to "not make sense"

are you new? do you not know what greentext means on mu

>>71749107
>>71749063
>>71748993
>>71748956
>>71748905
>>71748743
>>71748714
he is quoting the cringy lines from ok computer

what is there not to get, the music is good but hes right on thom being a angsty and whiny little manlet

>>71749107
>>71749063
>>71748993
>>71748956
>>71748905
>>71748743
>>71748714
I don't even agree with op but people like this is why everyone hates radiohead and its fanbase

>>71748661
OKC is fine, but it's way overrated. The only good track on the album is Lucky.

File: 01.jpg (56KB, 500x389px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 500x389px

>>71748661
>mfw this is what people do with Turn On the Bright Lights but they're being serious

>>71749166
Airbag > Let Down > Lucky

>>71748728
Read the lyrics over.

TRY to pretend you didn't take them completely out of context of the rest of their respective songs.

Gonna need a little more in-depth arguments if you want to actually try and convince people that the lyrics are bad.

>>71749132
Within the context of OK Computer, I don't see how the lines are cringy at all.

>>71749206
its still whiny and angsty garbage, regardless of context. such corny ass lines might as well ruin what little """"""""""""""""Depth""""""""""""""""""" the songs had to begin with.

>radiohead fans even defend the absolute worst parts of radioheads music, the emberassing and angsty lyrics

i need to start distancing from the fanbse its so emberassing

Do we really need an OKC thread every fucking day? Jesus Christ talk about something else

>>71749376
we will when something better is made

File: 45.jpg (77KB, 960x648px) Image search: [Google]

77KB, 960x648px

>his primary critique of ok computer is the lyrical content

what about the stellar production work and atmosphere, j greenwood's arrangements and thom yorke's ear for melody

art rock in general is so much more than whatever's going on in the lyrics (which sound fine with the music itself anyway given yorke's aforementioned ear for melody)

>>71748661
nothing wrong with that

>>71748743
kek

Go suck a lemon

>>71749482
Thom himself has said that lyrics dont really matter

File: free-shrugs.jpg (50KB, 449x642px) Image search: [Google]

50KB, 449x642px

tbqh I couldn't understand half of what he was saying on this album until i looked it up. Still loved it though

File: 75.jpg (57KB, 540x960px) Image search: [Google]

57KB, 540x960px

>>71749643
exactly, and they rarely do anyway. if you want wordplay and prose and substantial storytelling then pick up a goddamn book -- you're only wasting your time otherwise.

>>71748728
they are all objectively good lyrics

>>71749643
he's right, but radiohead has pretty good lyrics anyway

>>71749115
>>Radiohead is light years ahead of either of those bands.
>>Radiohead
>>ahead of my chemical romance and 21 pilots
can you actually form an argument, you weenie? why aren't they? you have literally nothing to disprove the first part of post >>71748905

>>71748661
one day, /mu/ will realize that this shit does not bang

>>71749163
TRIGGERRED