/mu/ BTFO once again
>critics
>relevant
pick one. Nobody will care about poptimist memerap 20 years from now
Let me know when Scaruffi gives his opinion
>>71734864
You're retarded, look at all the shitty pop stuff thats still relevant from the early 2000s and from the 80s. Plebs are persistent.
>>71734844
>>71734864
>critics
>relevant
pick one. Nobody will care about poptimist memerock 20 years from now
>>71734879
Sorry but I don't care about what dumb flyover state plebs listen to. I don't care about the radio.
I only care about what is artistically relevant, and metal, memerap, and poptimist brainlet garbage will never be relevant
So he's style biting grime, house, dancehall, uk funky, etc.
Who cares?
>>71734911
Contemporary reviews weren't too kind to Revolver, but it was a little bit outside the box for such a visible band, for 66.
But that's not to say that there aren't TONS of albums that got good reviews at the time of release and will later be forgotten. Hell that was the fate of MBDTF until /mu/ went full autismo over it
>>71734994
They loved Revolver in Britain. Reaction was more mixed in America.
>>71734931
I wish that your mindset was more prevalent but what is "artistically relevant" is not all, or even the majority, of what you'll hear about in pop culture decades later. Don't expect for people like Drake to just fade away I predict we'll be seeing his face for a depressingly long amount of time.
>>71734911
Yes, cause it is super hard to grade in hindsight
>>71734931
>>71735048
what definition of "relevant" are you guys using?
>>71734844
I think 7.8 is fair. It's a fun album, but nothing too special.
There's nothing to gain from shitting on everything just to be angry.
>>71734844
It deserves a 3, but I can understand why some would give it a 6 at most. But I feel like p4k giving it less than BNM is already saying a lot about how middling this album is
Pitchfork score is fair imo. Not worthy of BNM
>>71735259
yes there is