Why remix a song? Are there any good remixes?
>>71702126
when an "artist" is talentless they will remix a good song, since they can't write one themselves
>>71702126
A lot of the Andy Weatherall and Paul Oakenfield's remixes of 90's Madchester are better than the original.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GIVby7JZuUE&list=PLPEWE2tzsgtwc6K3yxj_QltYCqLJwPnNk
>>71702126
this is the stupidest post i've seen on /mu/ today and it's only 9:30
>>71702126
A remix of Soon by MBV that I like:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CqFAMyngGlw
>a remix is basically an inner-industry thing, usually happends when the first final mix is bad/not wanted/not good to master or to make it surrond
>you need the original tracks
people mistake it with the dude completely new song lmao "remixes"
Why are remixes so big in electronic music? Are they essentially just cover songs?
>>71702659
no? they're alternate arrangements/mixes of a certain track
christ /mu/ is stupid today
>>71702682
>today
>>71702126
old but gold
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IUGzY-ihqWc
>>71702714
>this song is 13 years old
music for this feel?