and allow fresh artists to be heard? Instead of using their fame and connections to keep their mostly irrelevant music choking up the radio, and keeping better bands from ever being heard?
Pic related is case in point.
>>71682948
No. Foo fighters are actually quite patrician when you examine the music theory behind their songs
>>71682948
Yeah.
It's been a long time since I listened to Foo Fighters though.
>>71682948
If you could make millions when you were older wouldn't you? Not going to give up that opportunity just to "clear up the radio" for young bands that are probably just as bad.
>>71682948
Lol
>>71682948
not when you owe your ex wife 50k/mo
must suck to be Dave Grohl; frontman of a popular rock band but you'll always be known as Curt Cobain's bitch
>>71683439
>Foo fighters are actually quite patrician
>>71684333
John Frusciante has it worse
>>71682948
Socialism for music. Sounds great, what could go wrong?
>>71684529
>On October 19, 2015, a judge ruled in favor of Turley saying Frusciante had to pay his former wife $53,000 a month. Frusciante was also forced to pay $71,000 for Turley's legal expenses.