post your music library size
>>71647970
>>71648079
>not having at least 1 TB of music
been a little over 2 years since my library got raped
453gb
23938 tracks
>>71648117
almost
I wonder
>>71648195
>>71647970
more than you
>>71648079
more than you
>>71648101
more than you
>>71648117
more than you
>>71648163
more than you
>>71648179
more than you
>>71648190
more than you
>>71648195
more than you
Does not include album covers, ebin maymays etc
>>71648163
>>71648179
>>71648195
>>71648079
Take it from someone that at one point did have 1 TB of music : must of what you have, it probably garbage. You forget about what you do like and can't remember even 10% of what artists you have. It takes a long time to recover from this.
I've got 3 terabytes of 60's pre-ambient
800 gigs of live recordings of this local band called the fuckerfucks. They played only 2 shows before breaking up but I had 11 redundant recording rigs all recording flac which I then layered over one another for 25,000 kbps bitrate.
8 terabytes of the beatles. No not THOSE beatles, the new beatles. They haven't recorded an album yet and technically they're not really a band yet but they're indie-gospel-post-funk-punk style is going to be huge when you guys hear their stuff in about 5 years.
4 petabytes of the Ethiopian Free Jazz wave that occurred in 1973 in a town called Wenji Gefersi.
18 terabytes of sound check recordings from the mid 90's band LFO. They only scored a hit with "I like girls (who wear abercrombie and fitch)" but they were way ahead of their time.
That's just my C: drive. I have 41 drives.
>>71648249
more than you
checkmate
Ok
>>71648365
this
i used to download for the sake of downloading at times. now i actually have a connection to the music i listen to and spend time with it.
>>71648117
t. flacfag