ITT great albums with terrible cover art
>>71639030
thats a rad cover though
>>71639030
What are you smokin?!'
That's a great cover.
That's legit one of the best covers of the decade
>>71639030
I wouldn't know of any
>>71639041
>>71639088
Why do you like the cover? It reminds me of A Tribe Called Quest album cover if if they chose to fire their graphic designer.
...
>>71639221
I kind of see what you mean, but the album was before this colour palette was associated with hip-hop.
It kind of fits the album. It's spiky, like Andy himself.
not sure if this counts since it's not the one they ended up using (though i'm also not a fan of that one desu)
>>71639221
It's amazing graphic design incorporating the XTC name with the stylized face. It's almost cubist. Great use of colors too.
>>71639269
That's a fair enough point. it's definitely reflective of Partridge's acerbic wit, and it was pre hip hop. That said, it's a connection I can't really dismiss. What might have been good design then doesn't look so great now, even if it isn't the designer's fault.
>>71639289
I'm just trying to imagine it as a sleeve in my collection, and I feel like it's just too garish. It's vibrant, for sure, and that makes sense for New Wave, but it feels too abstract, like it doesn't really want to say anything.
Nothing tops this
>>71639196
Op here, this is a fantastic cover. Not as good as Heroes, but it's still damn great, especially if you get the sleeve as each part of it only covers a quarter of the picture, so you don't really get the full image of Bowie's disfigurement- you kind of just get suggestions that something is off from each piece. Really fits the mood of the record.
>>71639030
Aw man. I love that weird, vibrant, cubist kinda thing that was going on in new wave album cover art.
The 90s had a similar thing going on, but mostly with cartoons and music videos.
Considering their other covers this shit is fucking thrash
>>71639156
that's fucken tight tho
>>71639411
great cover actually desu
Basically every ELP album except Brain Salad Surgery.
>>71639411
Wtf this album cover is beautiful, especially the choice of colors; the only thing is it's a bit rough around the edges
>>71639427
>red + yellow
heck no
the zombies look lame too
Literally every album whose art was done by Hipgnosis.
>>71639196
To this day I have zero clues what Bowie is even trying to say with this cover.
>Reality: Bowie wants to be an anime character, commentary on otakus?
>The Next Day: Taking the past, referencing it while moving ahead in life and not looking back
>Never Let Me Down: Bowie falling, chaotic and reflective the album.
>Lodger: Just make me look like a Cronenber character!
>>71639030
I think it captures the new wave aesthetic quite well
>>71639030
>>71639182
>>71639196
>>71639411
these are all great though
>>71639411
Eh, it's alright. I agree though, it's crap compared to Feels, SJ, or Merriweather.
Painting With is much worse, but it's also a bad record, so it doesn't fir the criteria.
>>71639167
lmao
>>71639030
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LtQHIv2O8x0
Note: Haven't listened to the whole thing but it's pretty good.
>>71639471
Shit, wrong thing!
Here:
>>71639448
Thought I think Lodger has a good cover, Bowie often picks pretty bad cover art for otherwise good records. Low is one example of a great record having just kinda okay artwork (especially compared to Heroes right after it). Reality is an obvious example as well.
Most egregious for me in terms of disconnect between quality of album and quality of artwork is Outside. Great record, his best 90s work. Terrible artwork.
>>71639447
The Peter Gabriel covers are wonderful what are you on
>>71639500
japanese characters automatically make it better + it fits the style of the album
>>71639494
Only Scratch and Melt desu, and they're the exception, not the rule.
>>71639567
this is a completely fine cover, wtf is wrong with you
>>71639196
Fuck, no.
>>71639359
>>71639467
>>71639600
lmao you FOOLS! that's an OC edit i made and i'm just shilling it here!!!! hook, line, and sinker kiddos
>>71639637
I mean, it's still the basic cover of Lodger.
>>71639585
it's just plain generic is what it is
>>71639726
just stfu right now
>>71639749
It fits their shitty music
>>71639779
bad post
>>71639783
the pet sounds cover is classic idc what you think
>>71639428
this.
>>71639289
>It's almost cubist
So its shit
>>71639467
>>71639779
Their feeding goats you fucking contrarian retards
>>71639882
literally what is your point
how is that meant to make me think it's a bad cover
>>71639222
Imagine in Hedgehog's Dilemma the entire Skylarking album playing when Shinji is walking through the Japanese countryside.
>>71639816
that cover rules though
>only b/c the features are on the front
>>71639923
>>71639816
This, looks like a character from Samurai Jack or something.
>>71639929
Anon, this is great albums with terrible cover art
You got the reverse
>>71639942
checkout his artwork for "the big cover-up" even better.
>>71640177
isn't the dude who did it an actual artist/cartoonist? i feel like ive seen a lot of stuff he's done
Absolute worst cover art in my library
Theres so many things that couldve been done with the sound of the album being so hawaii / tropical themed.. just makes me sad
new blanck mass cover is horrendous
>>71639870
edge, right there
>>71639428
>Not liking the Tarkus cover
>Not Liking the Pictures at an Exhibition cover
>Not liking the debut cover
>Having any opinion at all about Works Volumes 1 and 2 covers
It's just Trilogy and Love Beach that have bad covers.
>>71639222
God I want to fuck Asuka
>>71639485
worst cover of all time
>>71639779
literally nothing wrong with this post
>>71639929
I wish you underage autistic fucks would go away
>>71642576
Do you not like topless men? Are you ins-s-s-cure?
Script Of The Bridge is legit the post-punk album of the 80s but fuck me that cover is bad
Not as awful as their later ones though
Doesn't matter how "ironic" this might be, I'll never get used to this cover
And this remastered version, holyyyy shit, they went full Pen & Pixel with this one