Can all of music be placed on this chart? Also post yours

Yes but only because those dimensions are incredibly broad terms

>>71609718
Red: Butt Metal
Blue: Super technical Math Rock
Green: Indie Pop/Twee
Purple: Twinklely Math Rock

File: template3.jpg (43KB, 910x728px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 910x728px

>>71609718
accurate?

File: 1489676137399.jpg (46KB, 910x728px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 910x728px

By politics

>>71610757
Fuck off

>>71610975
Well ur a mr.grumpy pants ;)

File: ish4tGS.jpg (20KB, 433x218px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 433x218px

>>71610563
>Blue: Super technical Math Rock

Four letter band names

Red: Coil
Blue: Korn
Green: Toto
Purple: Beck

>>71611015
>this isn't harsh and complex
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h3JEkDShKoc

>>71611050
Switch Coil and Korn so you don't look like a fucking retard

Saw the thumbnail and came into the thread hoping for an ebin political slapfight.
Anyway, where does prog fit?

>>71611282
Probably center : far right

>>71611282
Prog would be on the right, mostly nearing the bottom.

>>71611050
>korn and beck
>complex
??????

>>71611282
depends, king crimson would be more harsh and complex than pink floyd for example
but probably center and halfway to the right I'd say

I just realized there's an axis missing and the graph isn't complete
Depressing - Joyful(Euphoric?)
So the chart should 3D. I think that would make it complete

>>71611291
>>71611298
>>71611349
Red: Rush
Blue: King Crimson
Purple: Genesis/Yes
Green: Jethro Tull
Eh, not sure on Red. Rush is hardly prog in the first place.

File: template3.jpg (50KB, 910x728px) Image search: [Google]

50KB, 910x728px

>>71610663
updated

>>71611217
Sounds really good, thanks anon

>>71610757
But post-punk is commie music

>>71611418
the red part is pretty unlike prog honestly. if it's fundamental then it's not jazzy / avant-prog, if it's harsh then it's not symphonic either
green could be pink floyd too desu

>>71611484
>Talking Heads
>either fundamental OR smooth

>>71611217
this is nice, thanks for posting

>>71611505
>Talking Heads
>complex or harsh

>>71611484
are you fucking stupid?

>>71611484
>elton john being technical
I cant tell if youre trying to be funny or just mentally ill

File: graph.jpg (47KB, 910x856px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 910x856px

It's more complete now

>>71611564
>I have only heard two or three elton john songs: the post

>>71611549
I actually like this one, except mbdtf i think youre overrating that one a bit

>>71611567
Those are emotions and are subjective, really shouldnt be a part of it. What we have is fine because were dealing with non debatable qualities

>>71611592
Probably right

>>71611525
Something tells me you've never listened to Remain in Light or, really, any Talking Heads album.

>>71611623
>Remain in Light
>Harsh or Complex
I'll give you complex due to some structures, even tho technically they aren't complex at all. But harsh? Are we talking about the same Talking Heads?

>>71611592
You could say complexity is subjective too. Rythmic complexity or sonic? I think the general mood (happy/sad) of a song is often pretty clear. Often just as the artist intended. You could change it to consonance and dissonance so it's ""technical""

>>71611623
also: I could agree if by complexity you mean challenging to listen

>>71611791
Not even remotely funny

>>71611853
You'd be surprised how many people could actually like this on those /mu/ memes facebook pages

>>71611460
> hasn't listened to Yank Crime
Come on lad

File: 1484369439414.jpg (8KB, 236x236px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 236x236px

>>71611549
>Yeezus and 808s
>complex

>>71611460
>>71611518
what the fuck has happened to /mu/ where people are new to drive like jehu?

>>71611454
Trout Mask isn't "complex" though, it's just fucking weird. different != complex

File: naco.jpg (58KB, 910x728px) Image search: [Google]

58KB, 910x728px

>>71612416
you're wrong

>>71612416
>being this pleb
Just because (You) don't understand it doesn't mean it looses all credibility.

File: 1488390376140.gif (335KB, 400x400px) Image search: [Google]

335KB, 400x400px

>>71609718
Assuming the axiom of choice there exists a complete basis for any vector space. And assuming that harsh/smooth and fundamental/complex are perfect opposites then we got a subspace in the vector space of all possible descriptors of music.