The Beatles literally are on another level of musical talent

>>71477005
Bu-but /mu/ told me the beatles were just a meme
Have I been mislead?

>>71477005
The Beatles fucking suck.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D5L5i7ARdAY

>>71477406
t. listens to Swans, Death Grips, Shoegaze and indie-folk

>>71477005
I hate the Beatles probably more than any other band in history and change the station immediately every single time they come on the radio.
To me they are unlistenable

>>71477392
they are good, but they're probably the most overrated band of all time. also anything before Rubber Soul is big doo doo fire.

>>71478051
Disagree.
A Hard Day's Night is basically the folk-rock blueprint.
The best songs on Beatles For Sale & Help! combined would easily stand up to the later albums.

File: 393b9e22.jpg (225KB, 658x657px) Image search: [Google]

225KB, 658x657px

>>71477005
Weirdly enough, even when I can appreciate the composition something about the sound never fails to annoy me.

>>71477791
How does it feel too hate life?

What's so magic about using a 1-4-5 progression in every fucking song

>>71478625
The Beatles rarely use straightforward I-IV-V though.

THE FACT THAT

>>71477005
4 equally impressive musicians it was a place in time that might not be replicated again

>>71479032
3*

Ugh, when will people just admit that they had maybe 3 decent albums and be done with it?

>>71478091
You're really smoking some major dick right now. Just stop before you embarasss yourself any further.

>>71477760
All way better than The Beatles

>>71478051
Actually, you can just go and throw Rubber Soul in there as well.