Spotify Lossless Coming

>>71432687
Wtf that's the same price I pay for Apple Music. REEEEEEEEE

>>71432687
who would pay for that crap?

>>71432687
Lossless is a meme. Nobody can tell the difference between 320kbps and flac.

>>71432726
This. It's just a waste a bandwidth, esp. if you're using shitty headphones like most people.

/thread

>>71432726
>being a so called "music lover" and listening to music through shitty headphones

>>71432687
Good stuff. Now they just need to update their library with more stuff because they lack quite a lot of things, and we'll be good.

careful what you say about spotify, they're paying mods here to delete valid criticisms such as their sjw intentions

>>71432726
Also
>not wanting best quality 24/7 on a phone app that doesn't take up stupid levels of space

File: 1486950360466.jpg (211KB, 683x1024px) Image search: [Google]

211KB, 683x1024px

Wait, so Spotify premium is getting less expensive? It's currently $9.99/month.

This is great for Premium users who don't care about FLAC. Like me suck my dick.

>>71432852
No I think it means it's 10 pounds extra

File: ZZZKKK (30).png (69KB, 211x198px) Image search: [Google]

69KB, 211x198px

>using spotify
>at all

This is the kind of people who claims you have shit taste, /mu/.

Lossless is such a fucking meme. What headphones or speakers do you use op?

>>71432925
>>71432755
>>71432726
t. earlets

>>71432925
Genelec 8330 / Beyerdynamic DT-1990

>>71432902
t. contrarian

>>71432902
Spotify is actually very usefull, I could finally listen to albums I couldn't find or I don't need to pay for them either.

>>71432788
[ ]

File: 1486904290251.jpg (273KB, 960x895px) Image search: [Google]

273KB, 960x895px

>>71432902

> free unlimited spotify streaming included in my phone subscribtion
> shitloads of max quality music available to me on demand
> using my modded pro's UE11 from work
> Listening to good quality music without effort everywhere I go, I love having to drive back from a show at night, smoking a spliff and listening to some music. The inears really help a lot with canceling annoying noise from having a car window slightly open for the smoke to leave.

File: glitchstanza.gif (216KB, 180x180px) Image search: [Google]

216KB, 180x180px

>>71432687
>vinyls

>>71432687
I just don't get it. 10$ or 5$ more for a month?

File: 1448953233320.jpg (56KB, 427x431px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 427x431px

>>71433249
>Doing drugs
>Listening without effort
>Letting just whavever plays
>Makes playlists
>Max quality at 192kbps

>>71433249
>driving with inears
That's what the car radio is for, I know the sound isn't as good but you should be listening for other cars or your engine fag

File: o4TC6ER.jpg (239KB, 1280x828px) Image search: [Google]

239KB, 1280x828px

You guys don't get how this works

Fidelity and lossyness aren't the same thing. Fidelity is how close to the original recording it is and lossyness is how close of a representation there is each time it's recreated

The only difference in audio quality you ever have to deal with here is the immediate jump between FLAC and mp3, you aren't making a copy of the file every time you listen to the song.

It ain't worth it unless you're REALLY into audio quality and you've already invested large amounts of money into headphones that would even allow you to pick up on the difference.

>>71432687
>VINYLS
WTF I FUCKING HATE SPOTIFY NOW

>>71434311
max bitrate is 320 you autist

>>71433249
>driving with inears
These are the worst people. You don't drive with head/earphones in, plus you look like a dick.

But will it also be audible-watermark-free?

I'm fucking canceling my subscription because they use the fake word 'vinyls'

>>71432902
Well then what do you use to listen to music on your phone? Spotify = unlimited music for like $9.99.

>was 10/month for lossless
>now 5/month for lossless

What's the problem

>>71432902
When you are an adult cis-gendered white male, you have the luxury of throwing away $10 a month to make another aspect of your life even simpler.