bowies or iggy?
Only the original. Fuck Remasters.
>>71421792
Both?
Iggy
>>71421736
i like iggy better but i love both
>>71421792
retard
Iggy. Bowie's might've been better if it wasn't rushed but of the two I'll take the one that makes the music actually sound raw as fuck.
>>71421840
First release was mostly Bowie (except Search & Destroy which Iggy demanded his version and maybe another or two by someone else I think) and the original Iggy mix exists only as bootlegs as far as I know. The 97/98 release happened to be remastered by Iggy. Maybe I didn't your answer to the question.
>>71421736
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YsN25BNa6IA
>>71421808
This is the only correct answer!
>>71421736
Iggy, bowie mix sounds like dog shit
>>71421736
I G G Y
G
G
Y
>anything but Iggy's
>>71421736
Edgy
>>71421736
iggy inside bowie
Vinyl rip of Iggys
>>71426341
Pretty well established that iggy was the bottom.
>>71421736
Bowie all the way. Bowie revived Iggy's career twice from the dregs, then Iggy started bad mouthing him in the early 90's. not cool. I still dig Iggy and have met him several times - he's active in the Miami art and music scene - but without Bowie, Iggy would only be remembered as that guy in a fifty year old punk band.
>>71427595
That wasn't the question
Iggy's, 100%. Listen to Search and Destroy on both, you'll notice that on Bowie's everything sounds super quiet and washed out. A tiny bit cleaner, yes, but not worth it at all for all the power it takes out. Also Bowie is a talentless hack who makes boring pop music for teenage girls