Now that the dust has settled, is it kino?

She sold out to the normies after the Grammy :(

>>71382989
In my opinion the first track is pure garbage. I hold out hope that the rest isn't. I like Lorde, not sure I like the direction and production.
We'll see.

>>71382989
I really like the pre-chorus but the rest is so bad specially the chorus it makes me so confused

>>71382989
I liked it.

it's a grower and let's not forget that royals is the worst on debut ye?
my only ''concern'' about this new project is that the entire album has been produced by that jack faggot
it's refreshing that, in the mainstream, a fairly new vocalist and writer like herself thinks a joel little/lorde lead single in 2017 would've been playing it too safe but to completely get rid of his productions for like 10 new songs? nah b

if it ain't broke etc etc

...btw the ending reminds me of this (which is a good thing) https://youtu.be/QaDUFC8nigM?t=3m
further proving my delusional point that she's on some modern kate bush type of shit

File: 1488650281115.png (121KB, 480x800px)

121KB, 480x800px

>>71382989
>kino

She didn't even try with lyrics like "We order different drinks at the same bars"

File: 8074604_orig.jpg (109KB, 442x689px) Image search: [Google]

109KB, 442x689px

>>71382989
Lana wins again

>>71382989
thats a nice cover

File: 1488613995474.gif (1MB, 480x270px)

1MB, 480x270px

>>71388198
This.

I wasn't even a fan of her in the beginning. I liked "Magnets", but this song is just another level.

Hated it at first but now it's growing on me. We'll have to wait to see what the final form of the album is.

>>71389713
Magnets is the worst song Lana has ever sung on. There's a reason it and the album it was on flopped.

This on the other hand, is not quite as good as her old stuff, but i'm very interested in her going an even more poppy, dancey, direction.

>>71391832
Lorde*

>>71392010

Whoops, oh well, they're basically the same fucking person.

>>71392060
1/10 bait or actual retard

>>71382989
My gf likes it so it's trash