Is U2 the worst band of all time?

no but their fans are, especially those who were listening to them at the beginning and still are

>>71361141
why?

>>71361148
You know anyone who listens to U2 back in the 80's? Ask them to tell you about their experiences about the band, music, albums, concert etc and you will see why.

>>71361183
i dont understand

Post punk u2 good

No, Bono is just overrated.

That's not the Rolling Stones.

U2 has some great early stuff man. If you want to label modern U2 as the worst, I won't oppose you.

>>71361141
My English teacher loved U2
he would use song lyrics as example sentances (for learning about punctation and other basic shit)
I hated him

>>71361135
>U2
they're not bad, they're just a public image ltd's rip-offs with hard rock vocals and no sense of humor

File: 84255953.jpg (500KB, 958x1200px) Image search: [Google]

500KB, 958x1200px

>>71361703
You should have payed more attention.

>>71361135
Joshua Tree stands out to me as THE album of 80's (I know thriller and purple rain were huge but JT just felt different) and Achtung Baby stands out as their best work. Everything else lies between not bad and shite

>>71361703
I can tell, you can't even spell a full sentence without a typo.

File: 1465719197495.jpg (37KB, 302x302px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 302x302px

>>71361699

>knocks The Rolling Stones
>defends U2