Is this album really as good as it is hailed as?

it sucks imo

>>71328789
Why don't you listen to it and decide for yourself?

Its good. but some of it seems like filler at times.

yes, from start to finish, no filler songs at all, very enjoyable, the greatest songs of the band are in it

>>71328789
The Beatles are easily one of my favorite bands, but albums like Paul McCartney's Ram and Magical Mystery Tour are way more exciting.

>>71328789
For me? No. Never really cared for George's tracks.

And Her Majesty destroyed the amazing ending the album could have had.

>>71328810
>anything i don't like is filler
>anything fun or not as serious is filler
There is no filler on Abbey Road.

Even Octopus's Garden has its merits.

>>71328895
That's the point, so that snobs like you go "ewwww" like a faggot. Fuck snobs, and fuck you.

>>71328805
I want mu's opinion on it. I'm listening to it right now.

no but its still really good

It's one of the only two perfect rock albums ever made. (the other is Animals)

>>71328930
>disliking 1 or 2 songs on an album makes you a snob.

....Ok.

It's perfect

Yes especially the second half

I genuinely believe if you do not enjoy this album, you are a contrarian.
my mom gets a pass because she says she's "heard it too many fucking times"

>>71329276
Its not that you don't like the song, its that you (and any other snob) got triggered by it being placed at the end of an epic suite

>>71329599
You're saying the ONLY reason they put it there was to irritate 'snobs'?

Why not just put it in the middle of the medley? It would have fit much better.

>>71328789
No, The Beatles are objectively shit.