ITT: artists that have only gotten worse with time

>have only gotten
opinion discarded

>>71242180
jfc why did u have to remind me ;_;

Incubus

I dunno, I like Four. Hymns was hot garbage though.

File: daft_punk.jpg (10KB, 300x300px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 300x300px

>>71242180
RAM is so bad.

almost all artists desu

File: linkin-park.jpg (46KB, 636x421px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 636x421px

you know it's true

>>71242336
I thought they started rock bottom

>>71242204
>muh british spelling
Blah blah blah.

>>71242221
I know, right.
>band forgets to experiment later on so they slowly fall from grace
Comparison for those whom have never heard Bloc Party.
2005: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wxSMrjkJvNw
2015: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ta2g5AcA4aU
This is sad because Bloc Party was about to become as huge as, let's say, Muse. But everybody forgot about them.

>>71242293
Four is "good" in the way that it's well produced and catchy, but it feels like generic indie wussy rock band #24376, that's the problem.

>>71242382
I guess it's not a very interesting album for sure. Maybe I just remember it more fondly because Hymns was so fucking bad. Like I don't even understand how they released that shit.

>>71242382
what the fuck that new song is dreadful

>>71242180
Enjoyed that Wearin' My Rolex soundalike track Kele made a few years ago.

>>71243040
>2004
>I know the government administered AIDS
>2016
>I WISH MY DICK HAD A GO PRO
Damn...

most acts get worse over time. how many get better? radiohead? beatles? floyd? gotta be less than 5%

File: Muse.jpg (34KB, 400x318px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 400x318px

First 3 were pretty good but they started getting more mediocre as they released more albums.

>>71243346
>3 hungry skellies
wew lad

>>71242382
It's who, not whom. Use whom the way you would use him.

Chance the Rapper