/electronic

>>71169107
so house and techno are cool then?

>>71169194
yes

>>71169194
>>71169236
No
Fuck off
EDM sucks

File: a1707763978_10.jpg (168KB, 1200x1200px) Image search: [Google]

168KB, 1200x1200px

You want dance music or just music with synths?
Either way I'm spamming this until it becomes /mu/core because it's good as fuck

>>71169265
It may suck but not as much as faggots who come into threads and post shit like that

>>71169107
What is this face trying to convey?

BEEP BOOP BABABABABABABA
TRRRRRRRRR
CHHHHHK KCH KCHHHHHH
TRRRRRDRDRDRDRDRDRDRDRDRDRDR

>>71169422
strum strum
dum dum
boo-hoo look at how depressed I am
strum strum

>>71169316
It's all corporate pop shit. I think it's okay if we call it out.

>>71169444
i was just being electronic!
also nice trips

If you want shitty EDM top 40 music go back to /bleep/

Was reading an interview with Aphex about Syro and he said there was basically very little computer used in the creation of it. How the fuck does he do it...

WHO WAREHOUSE HERE

Electronic music isn't afraid of "hurr durr they're just pushing buttons and the song is made" accusations, they're exploring new timbres and textures day in, day out. Even awful dubstep artists are at least doing something novel, and someday it will evolve into something more artistic. Disclosure has shown us that tasteful pop songwriting is indeed possible in the dance music realm. Anderson Paak makes danceable hip hop music with a mix of live and electronic instrumentation that sounds fresh. Skrillex, hated as he maybe, helped the masses fall in love with obnoxious noise, the product of hours working on synthesis.

What does /mu/ think of QUIX?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0LByKWvfUrw

ELECTRONIC
SUPERSONIC

>>71170758
It's not as difficult as it seems honestly. It becomes very believable once you've handled the same tools. It's still laborious though.

Really want to engage in SEXUAL INTERCOURSE with whoever invented downtempo

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j5p_Lnxw6No