>when your entire career is based on ripping off ones dudes obscure bedroom tapes
>>71125261
...are you referring to yourself, or...?
Even though Pom Pom is one of the worst albums I've ever heard, I really wish all Grimes faggots were banned from this board. You're all a bunch of fucking losers.
oops whats this?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gHrsv0NVa6k
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ecSg9WpLgl0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zPlFdX08UJg
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SdQ41k9Aeio
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xVOJla2vYx8
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8NChvenJcwk
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fa76c04G744
listen at 2:15
he stole the piano part from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e4x_mXNJ-3w
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fYUvI-Bgpuw
listen to 0:25
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VW4Fe2LYJfw
stole it from 0:38
>>71125309
>obviously referential music is referential
LOL ARIEL BTFO AMIRITE
>>71125403
>referential music
>>71125309
>sampling is stealing
k grandpa
>>71125309
ariel has good taste
nice finds
>>71125296
dude, this is an ariel pink thread. wtf, why do you mention grimes even here? post traumatic stress disorder?
>>71125296
Nobody mentioned grimes, you need to get your head checked if you hate grimes so much you're imagining people who post things that are tangentially related to her to be working in service of grimes then maybe you need to get your head checked. your a real sicko.
>>71125309
That's actually really interesting. I always get irked when things like this are revealed yet bowie gets shit on because eno brought his synth to the berlin sessions.
>>71125309
>sampling is plagiarism
idiot
>>71125296
Stop. You're going to make them come here.
>>71125500
ariel ripped this off by himself...
bowie on the other hand...
>>71125439
>>71125501
>I don't know what sampling is
>>71125554
just about every example you posted was clearly using the source audio as a sample. you are definitely subject to the dunning kruger effect if you think he legitimately tried to pass off that music as his own. you should go to facebook or some other normie site.
>>71125533
Hi. I'm a Grimesfan. ;)
>>71125645
DAMN.
>>71125296
YOU FUCKED UP REALLY GOOD NIGGA.
>>71125661
explain how he tried to pass those samples off as his own work. thats the only context in which i would consider his use of another person's work to be stealing. also, how at all was my comment unintelligent? you are some pathetic grimes worshipper i bet.
>>71125711
Chill! I don't bite people. I trolled countless people, but not this time.
>>71125756
rippin off != sampling
>>71125798
yeah, my point exactly. ripping off is claiming another person's work as your own. he very obviously didn't do that. for you to assume that was his intent shows a hefty underestimation of his musical ability on your end.
>>71125309
wtf I hate ariel pink now
>>71125309
> a few songs in his large discography have some samples in them
>>71126316
Who are you quoting?
>>71125626
Different anon speaking.
Does he give any sort of attribution for the more extensive samples used in his liner notes? Seems to me that would be the deciding factor.
>>71125309
>complaining about someone sampling Pictures at an exhibition
that's quite literally the most autistic thing out there, riffs from classical music are used and purposed all the time, look at kraftwerk tour de france:
( 0:24 )
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W91cHi7iRh0
( 0:15 )
https://youtu.be/QLiai4gg_0Q
and all the songs your posted sound very different from the ariel pink songs, they're inspirations, not ripoffs
>>71127162
I do not think he credited Mussorgsky, who died more than a literal century ago, in the liner notes, no.
>>71125309
Beverly Kills could be "ripping off" any fucking 80s pop like "Beat It", for example, but you decide to go ahead and literally cite the only 80's song that doesn't sound anything like Beverly Kills at all
>>71125261
He looks like Chris-chan.
>>71125309
this really shouldn't affect whether you enjoy ariel's music or not. he obviously wants to shed some light on lost ideas and music of the past, not to cut corners in songwriting
interesting finds though
>>71128121
What about the performers of it, who it's fair to say we're around a bit more recently?