>/pol/ vs /mu/
>Map Boy vs Melon Man
WHO WILL WIN??
Compulsory Viewing:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lyLUIXWnrC0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yNmta1gFjxU
Personally, I think Paul will be kill
I'm not watching that shit, but is there any outcome they both die?
First haha Paul will lose
>>70987185
/pol/ always wins but that's because the majority of the population is ignorant/racist.
are you serious
obviously melon man, I'm not even a fan I think his music reviews are awful but he made that guy look like a total moron
>>70987185
paul watson made me unfollow and stop watching alex jones. i used to really enjoy that shit too, but seeing this idiot with his way too biased and out of context videos got annoying everytime.
>>70987185
B T F O
T
F
O T F B
T
F
O
>>70987205
yes but Paul just proved that he is uneducated, and can't say "ureyenal" properly.
>>70987205
Majority of the population are virtue signalling faggots who are to stupid to consider the repercussions of their life choices but don't mind about making disastrous decisions along as it doesn't affect them personally
>>70987185
>Personally, I think Paul will be kill
>will be
What are you on about? Fantano already won.
>>70987219
His voice makes it impossible for me to take anything he says seriously in addition to the edgy content.
It's almost caricature
>>70987270
Virtue signalling is one of those ideas that was initially used intelligently, then picked up by idiots like you who use it to make it seem as if any attempt to make morally informed political decisions is self-important and vain. You're the kind of ignorant dumbass he was talking about.
>>70987275
Nah. Just wait until he responds. Then we'll see the damage control.
>>70987286
anyone who creates that much content that often is just doing it as a job at that point. trust me i used to create content. shit gets old after a while and youre just doing it to pay bills after a while.
Whenever I hear someone verbalize "SJW" in real life it makes me cringe. Just say regressive leftist, it's actually a real academic term and means the same thing.
>>70987290
he'd save more face if he left it, he'll only get destroyed again
>>70987329
he seems too full of himself to not respond
>>70987289
libtards like you are ruining this country
>>70987275
Paul is going to respond, and we will have to wait and see if he gives a strong, well though out clap-back, or just a ten minute long list of buzzwords
>>70987344
>>70987329
He said he'd respond.
>>70987353
>unironically using "libtards"
dude u get no bitches lol
>>70987353
And of course you immediately assume I live in your country because your worldview is that of a four year old child with a learning disorder. Kill yourself you legitimate moron.
>>70987357
He can't though. What he said was /pol/-tier "degenerate" bullshit.
>>70987357
I hope he has a proper autistic go at Memestano instead of countering anything he said in the video.
Let the juice flow.
>>70987357
I'm going with the ladder
DARE IS NO COUNTA COULCHA
I don't like Fantano that much but the other guy is legitimately mentally handicapped. His response will be autistic shrieking about liberals and hipsters. Only the most retarded neckbeards on this site will fall for this meme.
>Saw Paul's video on depression
He's a retarded pleb who relies on clickbait, his videos are titled as if they came from Buzzfeed. No, he won't win.
>>70987185
Stop with these threads already. And mods, do something for once.
>>70987397
But that ladder is mine
>>70987402
god damn
he really does make the British accent sound like some nignog slurred speech
>>70987290
>>70987357
Did he say he was going to? I don't follow his social media so I wouldn't know.
>>70987631
he commented on youtube saying he will respond and calls fantano a "balding triggered hipster"
>extreme right versus extreme left
Gee, i wonder who wins? Oh wait, no one.
Also anyone want to exchange kik?
>>70987631
Yes, he's going to. He should just ignore it.
>>70987641
kek, this gon be gud.
>>70987657
>kik
is that a new slang word for STD?
>>70987641
>"balding triggered hipster"
so fucking ironic since melon man is the normal one in this conversation
Just the sound of Paul's voice makes me cringe
>>70987683
EXCYOOOOSE MEEEEE?
>>70987185
Shit can't believe PJW actually named the Jews in this one. That's a first.
How long before he starts redpilling normies on Coudenhove Kalergi?
>>70987683
Triggered has two uses.
One is a way of mocking people that lose their shit over the slightest or most petty thing.
The other is a way of backing out of an argument when called out on something. Basically pic related.
>>70987657
>Anthony Fantano
>Extreme left
>>70987784
he likes rap, that's proof enough for the counterculturist right wing centerist.
>>70987185
>this is a rancid assault on the senses
This guy's videos are a rancid assault on the senses. Why are you yelling? Please stop jabbing your face forward with every syllable.
>>70987185
>"Hopsin has the mental capacity of a 14 year old atheist"
My sides were in orbit, melon boy was right on this
>>70987856
melon boy was right throughout the video
I wonder how Paul feels after getting a virtual sodomizing.
>"there is no [alternative music]"
Kekkelini
>dude there is still good music, Radiohead, Death Grips, Kendrick Lamar, le list could go on..
top kek
>>70987353
>this country
And which one is that? You are aware this website is available in more countries than your own, right?
>yo there is /mu/core out there therefore popular culture is okay
>you can't define postmodernism therefore you can't criticize it
>oh you're gonna blame the jews now or what hahaha or maybe lizard people fuck you lol
fantano essentially said NOTHING of value in that entire video
>>70987185
Anthony completely destroyed him
>>70987185
>starts video with Miley's cunt.
>then complains about it
>>70987185
>paul JEWseph "i have an asian wife and am gay while on holiday, i hate SJWs and muslims but jews have no influence in anything whatsoever" watson
is /pol/ really this normie now?
God, fuck off already.
Reminder to report political bait.
>>70988039
This. He was very smug despite making no solid points throughout the entire 15 minute video.
>dude lamo fantano slayed him breh
Further proof that this is a containment board for adolescents.
>>70988078
>i have an asian wife
?
>>70987683
He's just bald also it's not as if he has a receding hairline and hes grabbing onto it he just shaves his head
>>70988039
>>yo there is /mu/core out there therefore popular culture is okay
>>you can't define postmodernism therefore you can't criticize it
not at all what Fantano said
Fantano was countering the guy's argument that good music doesn't exist anymore, and he also explained that postmodernism isn't what the guy thought it was and why that meant his idea of it "destroying western values" or whatever was retarded.
>>70988181
PJW is talking about popular music, and then Fantano starts rambling off a list of /mu/core artists like Joanna Newsom. They are literally talking about two different things.
I just watched his new counter culture video, he criticizes the left for "jerking off in their moms basement" but I guess the hasn't ever been on /pol/ because they do exactly the same, but they do it watching japanese cartoons and being agoraphobic.
>>70988039
>>yo there is /mu/core out there therefore popular culture is okay
One of the points Fantano makes at is that you don't HAVE to listen to pop anymore if you don't want, you can choose what music to consume and if you made any effort to look for something more in your taste you would see that there is no point complaining about what is portrayed in popular culture.
>>you can't define postmodernism therefore you can't criticize it
if you have no knowledge about what you are trying to criticize then your criticism holds no weight and makes you look outright ignorant.
>>oh you're gonna blame the jews now or what hahaha or maybe lizard people fuck you lol
This comedic stab at the alt-right only takes up a few seconds of the 16 minutes of systematic deconstruction of PJW's weak, uninformed argument leads you to claim that;
>fantano essentially said NOTHING of value in that entire video
shows that you have clearly not watched/understood the video or just outright dismissed the arguments AF has put forward.
>>70987402
DISTWROYYIIN WISTUN CULLLCHA
>tfw drinking conservative tears
>>70987185
I'm a /pol/ack and Paul was really shit at this.
Although I think contemporary art is usually garbage because it's all message no beauty and skill, his points were garbage and he is doing nothing more than screaming in front of a camera.
DEH MAYNE STREEM METEOR
>>70987270
This
>>70987289
>>70987363
>>70987366
>>70987978
>morally informed
You mean "self protectionist"
That's the thing about shitlibs like you - you don't have the balls to admit that every political decision that you make (just like us) is for your own protection
The only reason you don't oppose immigration is because you're too scared of offending minorities
The only reason you don't take objection with feminism going a bit overboard on some things is because you're too afraid to offend women
You're too weak to achieve things by yourself, so instead you parrot things like "Yeah, equality for women! Yeah, oppose whiteness!" because it gets you claps from people who ARE strong enough to actually stand up for their OWN interests (women and minorities respectively, in this case)
As a former liberal myself, I think I can safely say all liberals are just whiteknights. "Don't worry, ladies! Don't worry, minorities! *I* will protect you from the evil white bullies! Now please will you go out with me... please..."
Truly pathetic if you ask me.
>>70987784
listening to rap makes you a leftist by default
Is he faking his accent?
>mfw the Frankfurt School redpill is too hard for /mu/tards to swallow
>>70987185
>implying /pol/ likes Paul
You must not frequent that board often.
>>70988328
>As a former liberal myself
>that post
Projecting so hard right now
>>70988209
Joanna Newsom is popular music
>>70988039
he still won though
it's so clear pjw didn't even read anything by the frankfurt school, doesn't even have the most basic idea of what adorno was all, and still goes on to blame them for essentially the culture industry they were decrying which is hilarious to me especially because he's so fucking self-assured. i don't know how anyone could listen to that guy talk unironically unless they're 15. in his next video he basically admits all of his fans are children
>>70988364
>y-y-y-y-y-y-y-y-y-y-y-y-y-y-y-y-y-y-y-y-y-y-you're just projecting!
That's not an argument.
>>70987813
>>70988333
That doesn't make him a crazy SJW commie, anarchist, etc.
>>70988328
you really think your shitty armchair psychology is political discussion though?
>>70988419
No you have to wait to be crowned in the role by /pol/. They are the ones who get to decided if you are an irrational SJW or if you make valid points.
PAW PULAH
MEW ZIQ
>>70988411
>That's not an argument.
neither was your post, just constructing a straw man from your own insecurities.
>adding that many y's
you look desperate as fuck I hope you know that.
>>70988435
>I disagree, but I am too stupid to formulate an argument to explain *why* I disagree
I'd prefer if you at least attempted to make an argument to be honest
>>70988236
>his entire audience is 15yo's jerking it somewhere
>>70988485
psychological egoism is fundamentally false, that's why
https://static1.squarespace.com/static/551587e0e4b0ce927f09707f/t/57b5d1e0e58c624a6d3a657b/1471533552794/Feinberg%2C+Psychological+Egoism.pdf
>>70988475
>wah wah wah, I don't like your argument, but I'm too stupid to argue against it!
Classic.
>>70988498
>inb4 (((Feinberg)))
>>70988498
>psychological egoism is fundamentally false
Christ I thought /mu/ was stupid but I didn't think it was this stupid
You are joking aren't you?
>>70988498
>a single philosopher has made an argument against psychological egoism, SO THAT MEANS IT'S OBVIOUSLY FALSE!!!!!!
Holy fuck
Hang yourself
>>70988512
>le altruism doesn't exist because you have reasons to do stuff arent i edgy xD
>>70988524
as opposed to some anon and /lit/'s fotm meme philosopher of yesteryear?
>>70988527
>>70988538
>So much altruism, wow, it's so evident to me that altruism is an INNATE quality, present in EVERY SINGLE HUMAN BEING, as something we've EVOLVED TO HAVE!
>There's no way that it's just something we do to curry favour from others. No way at all.
>For example, if a soldier jumps on a grenade to save his troop, it's genuine selflessness guys! Because we know that if he wasn't a paid soldier, well fed by his military, he would still be selfless wouldn't he! It's totally not the case that he only jumps on the grenade because he has agreed to be trained to act in a selfless manner - and it's totally not the case that he only agreed to be trained because it was in his interest to do so (the salary of being employed as a soldier, or if he's conscripted, fear of being locked up if he tried to wriggle out of conscription)
It's noble to believe in the kindness of others, friend, but when you get into the real world, you'll realise this kindness only goes so far, and that any claim of innate altruism cannot adequately explain the full gamut of human behaviour. Only innate selfishness can. And altruism, like I implied, is merely a social contract, like morality, that we only engage in when we believe it is in our interest to do so.
>>70987205
no, /pol/ always wins because of you.
>>70988496
He has confirmed that a lot of his fanbase consists of teenagers
>>70988328
Nice ad hominem. You just automatically assume you know what my political beliefs are and how I justify them without any actual information to prove your point. This is a logical fallacy. Furthermore you assume that the left (or any political group that opposes you) is composed entirely of the "shitlib" or "libtard" bogeymen. It makes a nice, convenient target that you can group a pretty diverse range of political beliefs into, so you can easily dismiss them all at once with a simple pejorative. How do you know that I oppose immigration? And if I don't, how do you know that it's because I'm scared of offending them? You assume, based on your generalization of "libtards" that I must be some weak-willed PC faggot solely because I disagree with you ideologically.
This is why this iteration of conservatism will fail. The reason I, and many others are against the immigration bans is because we don't see the world in such simplistic, black or white terms, wherein entire, diverse groups of people are labeled as being terrorists or dangerous to the very fabric of society. Yes, islamic extremists are a problem, but that doesn't imply that islam itself is the root cause of said extremism -- perhaps it has something to do with the years of disastrous foreign intervention and destabilization from countries like the United States than it has to do with Islam. It's hard not to hate people who have been killing your own civilians with drone strikes for years now. The United States has killed hundreds of civilians in the Middle East, more than ISIS has killed in the United States or any other first world country. On the contrary, ISIS has killed thousands of people in middle eastern countries -- the same kinds of people who are fleeing for their own safety.
Furthermore I'm not afraid of offending anyone. If I were afraid of offending people, I wouldn't even be responding because I'd have to respect your opinion, which I don't.
>>70988376
Yes, it is popular music since it is clearly not traditional or classical music. However, it's not POP MUSIC the GENRE within popular music that is the subject. Her appearance on some late night show had more dislikes than likes and the comments were full of plebs going "lol she ounds weird idk". To compare Joanna Newsom and Miley Cyrus is stupid and intentionally missing the point.
>paul watson, altright's weetheart, is easily REKT by a goffy musical youtuber
I am (not) really wondering where the triggered anons starting those threads are coming from...
>>70988243
absolute babytalk
>>70987205
>/pol/ always wins
Define wins? Because I feel like you've lost something dear if you're going to /pol/ at all.
>>70988631
eh i actually did some googling and found something that more or less supports your claim so alright
http://news.stanford.edu/news/2014/december/altruism-triggers-innate-121814.html
>>70987205
the paul guy is such a manchild its not even funny that he has a following
>>70987205
>/pol/ always wins
kek this is some sjw tier delusion
>>70987205
>/pol/ always wins
What Paul was saying was retarded but just because they have the choice of enjoying something with more substance doesn't mean that what is popular SHOULD be popular. This is what the majority of people are exposed to and can really influence a lot of things and ideas about the world.
>>70988754
>Nice ad hominem. You just automatically assume you know what my political beliefs are and how I justify them without any actual information to prove your point. This is a logical fallacy. Furthermore you assume that the left (or any political group that opposes you) is composed entirely of the "shitlib" or "libtard" bogeymen.
Actually it's more that I'm making the claim that EVERY HUMAN is fundamentally selfish. Therefore liberals' political choices are made on the basis of self-interest, just like conservatives'.
If you want to see my argument for the claim that we're all fundamentally selfish, see this post: >>70988631
>If I were afraid of offending people, I wouldn't even be responding because I'd have to respect your opinion, which I don't.
Ow, the edge. :^)
>>70988950
Nice, thanks man, maybe that's what I should do, find psychological studies to prove my point.
Looks like an interesting study.
I think you could run a whole plethora of psychological studies that essentially prove that selfishness is innate, and the basis of any selfless actions. E.g. run an experiment where people find a wallet with money in it - for half of the people, put signs up that make it clear they're being watched by CCTV; for the other half, put signs up that make it clear the CCTV is broken, not at all operational, and there is no chance at all that they're being watched (e.g. "Be vigilant! Our CCTV is broken!").
Obviously we know what the results would be - those who think they're being watched are much more likely to leave the wallet, and those who think they're not being watched will be more likely to take it.
Remember when fagtano wasn't an obnoxious sellout who appeals to 12 year olds? He's completely unwatchable.
I wish I could go one fucking day without seeing political opinions everywhere. Just one day. IRL. The internet. You can't fucking escape everyone insisting on telling you how they feel, what they believe, what they think...it's like being in some inescapable prison where everyone sits around all day saying their opinion. Fucking hell I miss political apathy already.
>>70990238
I feel like the right wing started to politicise the internet when GamerGate happened.
asdlksadksadkl