Post your most potent cringe.

File: Screen Shot 2017-02-06 at 1.02.14 PM.png (157KB, 569x647px) Image search: [Google]

157KB, 569x647px

>>70845117

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dNpTFjWyovo

File: Tiger Trap Review.png (47KB, 806x372px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 806x372px

>>70845230
fuck

>>70846177
>2:40

i came

>>70845117
What album is he giving 5 stars to?

>>70847588
i already said that it's mesmerized by system of a down

>>70847637
shit im a dumbass

File: 1485230315239.jpg (42KB, 492x419px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 492x419px

>>70845117
i've spent the last 2 days cutting myself and listening to anti-nightcore
it just brings me back f a m

>>70845172
Not really fair though because all of marcel's reviews are ultimate cringe

File: 1451625657418.jpg (20KB, 306x325px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 306x325px

>>70846191

Yeah, but Mezmerize is still a good album. I don't care what /mu/ thinks!

>>70847759
yeah but it's extra cringey when he tries to talk about jazz. kind of like melon

>>70847786
the way you typed that out with the punctuation and the exclamation mark at the end makes it seem like you're not serious. Are you? i listen to soad as a guilty pleasure plus this really cute chick in my class loves them and i want to shag her

>>70847839
not really cringe except for the last part

>>70845172
talk shit about the man himself and get HIT

>>70845230
dont do that please dont

>>70845117
Wait, how the fuck did he bring politics into this?

>>70846709

>>70847854
I am indeed serious. I do not listen to them as much as I used to, but I don't know, why SOAD should be a guilty pleasure!
They don't have anything to do with regrettable nu-metal and post-grunge from the 2000s, they just kinda did their own thing and it ended up pretty unique.

>>70848326
Hypnotise was the first album of theirs I listened to, so it holds a special place in my heart. Hard to go past their earlier stuff though, I think Darren wanted a bit too much to be a frontman towards the end

>>70848178
This is fucking triggering me.

>>70845117
http://rateyourmusic.com/~Grampus

>>70849180
Nah, man, Grampus is just a cute ol' grandpa. He even rates the specific issues of the albums he listens to.

And he's a big Randy Newman fan, so he's cool in my book.

>>70849258
his pop group - y review triggered me too hard
"I wish I'd kept the magazine review for The Pop Group's Y as it virtually implored me to sell the last of my worldly goods if that's what it took to buy a copy. I wish I'd kept it because at least then I'd know the name of the reviewer from which I could have traced an address, paid them a visit and burned their bloody house to the ground!

I know for a fact that this album has only been on my turntable once before and it caused a mixture of dismay, anger, frustration and disbelief. At one stage I actually thought the problem lay within myself - I simply wasn't intelligent enough to understand what was going on. Never mind not liking the music, for the most part I couldn't even distinguish a discernible tune! For 22 years Y has become notoriously known as the worst record in my collection.

I suppose the closest band I can compare The Pop Group to are early Killing Joke - but at least they realised the principle of music was rhythm. I've no objection to the weird and the avant-garde but when it consists of nothing more than screams, screeches and arrhythmic drumbeats ("Blood Money") I fail to see the attraction. The band are so far up their own backsides it would take a team of the best mining engineers to extract them.

The only thing of significance is the album title: Y as in "Why the hell was this made!!!""

>>70849306
lol. To be fair, Y ain't exactly an easy album.

File: wooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooow.jpg (5KB, 101x193px) Image search: [Google]

5KB, 101x193px

>>70848178
>you've been rumbled you charlatan
i'm dying