AND THOUGH THEY WERE SAD

>>70739697
Why is this album getting posted a lot lately? Is this all the same anon?

>>70739808
I don't know but I kinda like

It's pretty underrated

File: Soft Bulletin original intended tracklist.png (582KB, 1239x762px) Image search: [Google]

582KB, 1239x762px

Daily reminder.

WILL THE FIGHT
FOR OUR SANITY
BE THE FIGHT
OF OUR LIVES?

DRIVING HOME THE SKY ACCELERATES
AND THE CLOUDS ALL FORM A GEOMETRIC SHAPE

FEEEEEELLIIIIIIING YOOOUUUUUUUUURSEEEEEEEELLLFF

File: QVuhMv4.jpg (203KB, 2475x1600px) Image search: [Google]

203KB, 2475x1600px

>>70739697
>THE SOUND THEY MADE WAS LOVE....
>LOVE...
>LOVE...

>>70739868
[citation needed]

>>70740809
It was on the Pitchfork documentary.

>>70740828
When they said "this was our original intended tracklist?"

I wish this album maintained the standard of the first two songs, but so many of the tracks are so weak in my opinion

>>70740923
Like what?

>>70740944
Slow motion and What is the Light stick out, for starters.

So much of it just seems like the most empty and dull misinterpretation of 60s psychedelia.
Lyrics like
>>70740800
and "love is the place it surrounds you!" sound so naive to me

>>70741093
>Slow motion
OK I'll give you that
>What is the Light
Oh the epic centerpiece of the album? What's wrong with it?
>misinterpretation of 60s psychedelia.
Show me any 60s song that sounds exactly like it
>and "love is the place it surrounds you!" sound so naive to me
Have you ever been in love?

You're a literal degenerate if you can't appreciate this album.