>he unironically thinks Nirvana is above average in any way whatsoever
You are LITERALLY the definition of hipster. Fuck off.
This is a very important thread, OP. You're really the best.
>>70732156
>Nirvana
>Hipster
Explain.
>>70732346
Nirvana are one of the pleb band that Hipsters latch onto to convince people they aren't hipster.
>>70732156
Local H is better. Specifically Pack Up the Cats.
>>70732156
Alpha as FUCK!
>>70732384
you're joking
>>70732366
Explain how Nirvana's a bad band? and why it's wrong to like em.
6/12 of the tracks on In Utero are legitimately above average.
>>70732554
No really, it's a great album that I care for more than anything Nirvana ever did.
>>70732705
I mean... I respect your opinion, but I have to say I disagree on every measurable and imaginable level.
>>70732683
>half the songs are good
>ergo half the songs are bad
>So it averages out in the middle somewhere
Literally average
>>70732796
I see that reach
>>70732796
>a song is either bad or good
wew
>>70732156
nirvana had an above average-looking vocalist
>heh... yeah, I guess you could say I'm not like most other people. I've got "unique" taste in music. I don't really like mainstream (more like lamestream) music or stuff you hear on the radio which is just for dumb zombies who like clubbing. Nirvana is... different. It's heavy, it's hard, the lyrics are brilliant, and it's hip and fresh. Kirk Cobane was an absolute genius and it's a shame he died, but really it's probably for the best because he would be absolutely disgusted at the music that's out there today just like I am. RIP Kirk. *envisions himself smoking a cigarette* *goes to f.y.e., then Hot Topic, then Spencer Gifts* *asks mom for some money to buy a Starbucks in the food court*
>>70733496
>tfw genuinely like almost all of nirvana's discography
nirvana is neither a bad nor a hipster band. this is a lazy low quality shitpost OP and you should be pretty ashamed of yourself