ITT: Bands that deserved to be popular

File: A-132066-1395584992-7034.jpeg.jpg (16KB, 300x251px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 300x251px

These guys.

>>70705873
>have a wealth of talent, great songs and several great albums
>reduced to a classic rock radio one hit wonder as a legacy
sad

File: The Beatles.jpg (59KB, 500x408px) Image search: [Google]

59KB, 500x408px

>>70705764
Though they were an unconventional case in that their immense popularity allowed them to become as good as they did.

>>70705873
Cheap Trick is genuinely bad. This board has fooled you into liking em

>>70705893
not to mention the whole
>two good-looking guys, two ugly guys
meme

I mean I guess they played into it, but the fact that I still hear people say this in 2016...

should be:
>1977
>two guys looking like it's 1972
>two guys looking like it's already 1983

--which actually fits their sound pretty well

Wait is the topic popular bands who deserve to be popular, or unpopular bands that deserve to be popular? Because Sabbath is a huge name but wasn't in 1970?

>>70706123
I think it's the first one.

Popular bands that aren't overrated.

File: dc59290d.jpg (76KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]

76KB, 600x600px

>>70706155
Ah ok. Then I stand by Fleetwood mac. More people need to hear Tusk.

>>70706103
lEO

>>70706364
huh