What's worse: metal remixes or dubstep remixes?

File: 16266011_1216438371737272_5984477935119502989_n.jpg (71KB, 960x818px) Image search: [Google]

71KB, 960x818px

>>70666540
metal remixes

> LOL we took this pop song and chugged an open-E in time with it! Isn't it FUNNY xDDDDDDD

or

> Super Mario GONE METAL!
> some long-haired beardo plays the super mario theme at double speed on an electric guitar with distortion

I say this as a huge metalfag myself

>>70666540
well you can't just "mix" a song into a metal song, you have to re-perform it and re-record it. That's called a cover.

So by default dubstep remixes are worse by virtue of being possible at all.

>>70666540
>dubstep remixes
What's wrong with dubstep again?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xFC8UO-MN3c
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uijeNhcTqH0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zpV7radKuwo

>>70666596
it sounds like robot wet farts

>>70666606
Did you even listen to the tracks I posted?

>>70666540
psytrance remix is bad often

>>70666540
vaporwave

Are dubstep remixes even a thing anymore? I haven't heard anyone talk about dubstep since like 2012

>>70666540
First off like >>70666885 said, dubstep (aside from Skrillex and deadmau5) hasn't been relevant since around 2012. I'd replace dubstep remixes with trap remixes.
Second, I can assure you screamo covers are worse than trap/dubstep/metal remixes.

>>70666940
>trapstep remixes

>>70666615
he didnt, hes probably a hipster from /bleep/

daily reminder dubstep is great and theres nothing wrong with it

>>70666940
>deadmau5
>dubstep

hmmmm

File: received_1841476332776303.jpg (42KB, 936x1278px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 936x1278px

>No fine taste in both