What are some times when Pitchfork was completely wrong?
>>70525156
Pretty often desu.
>>70525188
This is retardedly harsh considering they gave CttE a 9.0
>>70525225
The entire big Yes review is a shitshow if you actually sit down and read it.
>>70525274
I fucking hate these flip flopping crowd pleasing faggots
>mall emo
>>70525156
Two days ago when they dedicated their website to being anti-Trump.
>>70525948
This or when they decided news was more important than reviews
>>70525938
this is a fucking travesty
>>70525156
not that time
Reviewers were too old to "get" it
>>70525938
lol
I like Drukqs as it is, but has anyone removed tracks and cut it down to less than an hour to make it sound like a masterpiece
When Needle Drop gave Jenny Death a 9
>>70526293
yup
should have been a 10
>>70526197
this is pretty terrible tho
when they didn't make terminal redux album of the year
Disgusting
Does anyone in the world actually agree with this score?
Here you go fags:
https://nsgrantham.github.io/pitchfork-reviews/
What a fucking joke
>>70525156
When they say a band's worst album is their best,
>>70526415
I'm fine with the score but the actual review is hilarious.
>I had never seen a shooting star before.
>>70525156
>If you wanna take the psychoanalytic bent, both have masculinity issues: Prog compensates with double kick drums and the phallic gratification of rabid shrrredding, while indie prefers to spin its shortcomings into anti-heroism.
>masculinity issues
>phallic gratificatio
I dont even need to see a picture of Sam Ubl. I bet he has dyed hair, a septum piercing and large frame glasses
Not saying it's a bad album but 10/10 is laughable.
>>70526488
>>70526488
Fuck you, its a 10
>>70526515
*deletes Power
Ok now we've got a case
>>70526541
You would need to delete Lost in the World, Devil in a new dress and Gorgeous too.
>>70526631
Lost in the World is fucking great. And if you delete that one, then keeping the final track wouldn't make sense
>>70526652
Which would be grounds for giving the album a less than 10 rating.
>>70525735
Yikes. That album isn't great, but it sure as hell isnt a two
>>70526197
Wait how the fuck
I get that it was the mid 2000s and it was trendy to hate popular albums but this record is legitimately pretty great. It's catchy, it's pretty original, and it's extraordinarily well written. Fuck pitchfork
>>70526367
Tru, for everyone that album is either like an 11 or a 2, how can you give it an 8.4?
Sure, their fanbase sucks and their lyrics can be somehwat pretentious, but their music is generally well-crafted.
>>70525156
Writing this while Age of Adz exists
>>70526415
>>70526447
just pure circlejerking truly the most insufferable review I've ever read surpassing Scaruffi tier pretentiousness.
>>70525156
>>70525301
>>70525735
>>70526197
>>70526611
>>70526778
These are all accurate though
that time they troy from community's camp like a 4
we get it OP you like the mars volta and pitchfork didn't
That time they shit on Daft Punk - Discovery
>>70525156
Always
>>70525156
>>70525156
All the time, because their reviews focus on context and not music
>>70528885
This. They spend the majority of each review comparing a bands' newest album to their debut.