i didnt like their previous 2 albums, should i listen to this

>>70389686
nope
4/10 album
a device for shillers or forced positivism

>>70389896
thanks, i read this magazine and they give it a 9/10 so i thought i should ask here before damaging my ears

>>70389911
1st album is really the only thing worth anybody's time

sounds like a less lo fi version of their older stuff. Not that bad. Probably not for you.

>>70389951
yup the new one is properly shit

>>70389686
just remove the vocals, jfc Romy is so annoying here

>>70389686
I found Jamies production/DJing to be more prominent here than the other two albums. If you happen to like In Colour maybe you'll like this one more than the first two.

>>70390839
>lo-fi

Why do you use wordsyou dont understand at all?

Lips are amazing.
I also really enjoy Performance

>>70393905
I do too, shame the lyrics are so bland