ITT: times pitchfork was wrong

>>70389527
They're wrong every time

It's a good album

>>70389527
every The Mars Volta album

File: wrong.png (469KB, 1661x986px) Image search: [Google]

469KB, 1661x986px

YASSSS KWEEEN SLAYYY

>>70389870
neither of those are good

File: 289334.png (237KB, 1159x327px) Image search: [Google]

237KB, 1159x327px

smhrntbhfam

>>70389713
This, just in the time you've read the review you could've listen to it and formed your own opinion
Or you know just continue being a wanker

man this board needs to cut loose with that website so bad

File: death-valley,-skull,-dry-land,-mountains-239568.jpg (470KB, 1600x1200px) Image search: [Google]

470KB, 1600x1200px

>>70389959
Have you seen the nightly p4k threads lately

File: image.jpg (56KB, 640x757px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 640x757px

One of their most garbage opinions, this album is so much better

>>70389979
no, why?

>>70390159
they're mostly dead

only active when a big release is getting reviewed

>>70389926
how slow do you read? do you have a learning disability?

>>70389527
This is a forgotten relic from the days of when Indietronica was still a thing and sounds terribly dated at this point in time, I'm not sure why you'd care

>>70391304

>indietronica
LOOL

This thread should be "times when pitchfork was right". You could link just about any pitchfork review in this thread and it would work. Horrible publication. I don't know why college-age kids still read it.

File: Mroizo.jpg (85KB, 2090x675px) Image search: [Google]

85KB, 2090x675px

>>70389527

Zaireeka's "im too lazy to actually listen to it properly" 0.0

>Cry about pitchfork
>Mock people who take pitchfork seriously
>Post about pitchfork continuously
>Don't ever discuss the numerous alternative music sites out there that could benefit from word of mouth on /mu/
>Wonder why people still go to p4k

really gets the synapses firing

>>70389713

statistically unlikely

>>70393678
this

>>70393600

needs to be lower. cocky electro-french house was one of the worst genres imaginable.

>>70393600

this irritates me. great album

File: tmp_12443-1483737382056-1068318276.jpg (4KB, 206x204px) Image search: [Google]

4KB, 206x204px

>>70389527

does it really matter if their opinion lines up with yours? it's literally just a few guys who work for pitchfork who writes these. Who gives a shit?

any emo in the late 90s to early 00s

>>70393678
no b8, share some alternative music sites

>>70394551
ive never understood the fascination with him. Acid Rap was good, like a 6/10 that suffered from extremely shitty features and repetitive production, butthe features after it and then Colouring Book was just garbage that suffered from the previous problems + having shitty verses and doing nothing interesting.

>>70394776
He blew up after that ULB verse, so everyone started riding his dick all of a sudden, which lead to stupid expectations with Coloring Book that he clearly didn't manage right. I think that if it dropped the gospel theme and was mixed better, it'd be a 7 for me, but as is it's insufferably bad.

Acid Rap was dope though, every song from the first half is a real earworm, but it loses its steam after the stupidity of Favorite Song