Bluetooth Headphones

>>70372752
No it's literally impossible for Bluetooth to be at the same level of quality as wired, we'll need new technology before that happens

>>70372752
Do they not have the same quality? I honestly couldn't tell. I'm using bluetooth with iphone 7 right now and it's great. I just started using blue tooth like last week and I don't think I'm ever gonna go back.

>paying more for a worse product

I thought /mu/tants knew better than falling for the wireless memes but I guess not

>>70372752
>beats
>iphone7
>bluetooth
is this a bait thread?

>>70372834
that's what I'm wondering

>>70372774
what he said for the retards itt

>>70372752
You should get those but in hot pink OP

Shit is fire

>>70372817
>>70372834
It was just an image I used to get an idea of the general topic.

I don't mean beats in particular, hell I don't even like them.

I ordered the Marshall Mid's but they sounded awful like listening through a aluminum can.

Can I only expect decent sound quality with spending like 300 bucks for the sennheiser momentum 2.0?

I'm really not trying to bait anyone.
Just out of convenience (and I know Bluetooth is worse than wired) I need Bluetooth headphones.
But as I'm not used to anything exceptional it shouldn't be too hard, should it ?

>>70372902
If you absolutely need the convenience of wireless the momentums are pretty good but you can spend less for better quality

>>70373029
Could you name any then?
I've looked into the AKG Y50bt but I don't know if they're any good. They're a lot cheaper though.

>>70373084
I meant you can spend less for the wired but as you said you want wireless

I know a few others like the T90s, ATH MSR7s, Sony MDR-1000s should all be in your price range, honestly its preference at the $300 mark

They make things for headphones that make them Bluetooth
I guess just try one of those before shelling out the money for entirely new headphones

>>70373176
I recommend sony at the moment i just bought the wired mdr-1a and the sound is amazing, they have these in BT along with the 1000x mentioned

>>70373176
>>70373242
Id be spending much less but wire isn't an option anymore for me. I'll definelty check out your suggestions!

File: sony mdr-1rbt.jpg (163KB, 624x351px) Image search: [Google]

163KB, 624x351px

>>70372752
currently wearing these
bought them used for $200 like a year and a half ago, at the time at least they were praised as the best sounding bluetooth headphones and they really do sound great, though not as good as wired headphones in the same price range. also they are comfy as fuck and the battery lasts like 30h of use.
on paper they didn't seem like a great investment but they're one of my favorite things, comfy af and i charge them like twice a month or something like that

>>70372752
>>70374158
about quality, i honestly believe that the headphones sound better with bluetooth than wired. probably because of the way they are designed to go with the bult in DAC and amp

as far as digital quality goes, p sure everything's converted to v0 or some equivalent VBR format with bluetooth 3 or more and that sounds good to me

>beats

[concern intensifies]

>>70372774
>No it's literally impossible for Bluetooth to be at the same level of quality as wired
Yeah! Because the teensy weensy little DAC chip in the iPhone is going to be loads better than what you could fit in the cups of over ear headphones. For fuck's sake /mu/.

>>70375070
you have no clue what you're talking about

>>70375097
GOOD point

>>70375185
same to you