What's better for music, London or New York? Past and Present

London

London currently

>>70352093
Past - Vienna
Present - London

File: 504e51c6beb6b7394b443f7e59aa5c04.jpg (53KB, 736x519px) Image search: [Google]

53KB, 736x519px

Manchester

>Past

London and it's not even close. The Clash, Bowie, Stones, Kinks, Who, Amy Winehouse, etc

>Present
Probably NY. Grime is pure cancer so London loses this one

>>70354804
Yeah but NY had swans, the velvet underground, talking heads, the strokes, and sonic youth

>>70354804
>Grime is pure cancer so London loses this one

This so much. Hate that a global leading capital city's music scene is dominated by complete shite.

London and New York were both great for music in the past.
London still has a lot of talent today, New York I'm not so sure.

>>70352093
New York

File: chrome_2017-01-14_20-03-18.png (247KB, 329x337px) Image search: [Google]

247KB, 329x337px

>>70352097

File: 10012794.jpg (17KB, 240x180px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 240x180px

Live music, probably about both the same on big bands , I bet NYC has the better small gig scene. For composing or making it , it hast to be London, lined up like skittles