Name an album with more bangers

exile on main st

>>70173319
Young Thug

>>70173319
TLOP ya filthy fuk

File: StarWarsOST.jpg (43KB, 420x420px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 420x420px

>>70173319

>>70173541
That album has like 6 bangers

>>70173585
>implying TLOP is better than the soundtrack of Harry Potter and the Sorcer's Stone

File: IMG_0418.jpg (707KB, 1137x2048px) Image search: [Google]

707KB, 1137x2048px

>>70173319
This album has absolutely no bangers. It's no wonder that it's related to one of the dullest franchise in the history of movie franchises. Seriously each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.

Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody; just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.

>a-at least the books were good though
"No!"
The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."

I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.

>>70173720
>ayn rand
lol

>>70173720
lol how's its feel putting so much thought and effort into writing a wall of text no one will read

>>70173720
Looked at picture. Didn't read

>>70173720
man, judging by that picture, you have shit taste in books

>>70173720
You can't be serious with that photo rite

>>70175056
>not reading Clifford extensively

plebe

>>70173720
when did this start spreading?

File: sean_connery_2.jpg (9KB, 198x254px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 198x254px

>>70173720
>clifford for president