>mfw i heard the new autechre track
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zmwDaFdVd8U
was that linked album created and recorded in real time?
>>70142877
yea i think autechre is experimenting more
Shit this is actually decent. Really wasn't digging the pretentious, un-listanable mess of an album that was Elseq.
This new shit sounds like a more engaging Confield.
>>70142607
Autechre records are purchased solely by bald men in expensive anoraks who would masturbate to a car alarm if it was re-mixed by a German.
Their music is an impenetrable curtain of misanthropic noise. Hopelessly pretentious. These menopausal electro-manglers’ refuse to bow to convention and produce anything of interest to anyone not either a) bald or b) German.
It bleeps. It skronks. It krrraaaanks. But mainly, it blows like a ruddy awful hurricane.
Remember, kids; if it sounds like a festering hillock of tune-shy bum-wank, it’s because it IS a festering hillock of tune-shy bum-wank. Avoid as you would a bald German.
>>70143445
what did he mean by this
>>70143445
Don't you have some shitty folk punk to listen to? You fucking nu-male faggot?
Favorite track on Confield?
it's a tie for me:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xdO9SzDd3OU
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N2O9yFBN3e4
>>70142976
Sounds like the same nihilistic trash its always been.
>I-It's so bad that its good!
Something that adheres to no natural sense of tonality or rhythm may have artistic value as a novelty, but no one actually enjoys it other than to be contrarian.
>>70144796
>>70143445
As someone who is addicted to Autechre like it's crack cocaine I can assure you that it's not popular because it's "contrarian". It's popular because more demanding minds require more complex music.
>>70145353
yea true
>>70142607
good track